An inquiry into the propagation of contagious poisons, by the atmosphere : $b as also into the nature and effects of vitiated air, its forms and sources, and other causes of pestilence : with directions for avoiding the action of contagion, and observations on some means for promoting public healthAlison, Somerville Scott
Science
An inquiry into the propagation of contagious poisons, by the atmosphere : $b as also into the nature and effects of vitiated air, its forms and sources, and other causes of pestilence : with directions for avoiding the action of contagion, and observations on some means for promoting public health
Alison, Somerville Scott
Communicable diseases; Public health
CHAPTER I.
PREVALENCE OF DOCTRINE OF ATMOSPHERIC CONTAGION, INJURY TO PATIENT,
ATTENDANTS AND VISITORS.
Atmospheric contagion, to which public attention is directed, has been
regarded for many ages as the cause of a great proportion of the
pestilence incident to the human race; and, at the present day, most of
the diseases which are wont to be widely spread, and to be very mortal,
are usually considered as depending on that agent, both by the
unprofessional and the medical world: indeed, so extended has been
thought its sphere of action, that it is suspected to be operating in
almost every case that occurs, of those diseases which usually attack
many at the same time; and, in nearly every instance, its existence is
positively inferred, where previous cases can be shewn to have been
prevailing, though at the distance of several miles.
It is a fact familiar to many, that, on the occasion of the late
prevalence of Cholera Morbus in the years 1831 and 1832, that infection,
through the medium of the air, was considered the most common cause of
the propagation of that scourge; and every mother is taught to regard
every case of scarlet fever, common fever, hooping-cough, and many such
disorders, as a very centre of infectious air that possesses qualities
subversive of the health of her children.
Ordinary conversation, too, marks well the common belief in the positive
injury that agent inflicts. In general, it seems a matter quite out of
the question to suppose, that the patient may have got his sickness from
the operation of other and distinct causes, as is sufficiently evident
from such common questions as these, “Had he visited any person ill of
the same complaint?”—“Where, and from whom, did he get the infection?”
and likewise from the ordinary replies, “He got it from a friend, at
whose house he called to inquire after his health,”—“He caught it when
passing through a street in which a person lay ill of the same
distemper.” Such inquiries and replies are made not only by the public,
but by the medical profession also, who are, in general, sufficiently
satisfied if such answers and solutions as those above be given. Were it
necessary to say more to prove the important position infection holds as
a cause of disease, and as the chief instrument of its propagation,
references might be made to thousands of instances, narrated, too, on
medical authority, where whole visitations of pestilence have been
attributed to its operation, and volumes might be filled with the most
skilful artifices, devised, and actually carried into execution, to
deprive the air of its invisible poison; but these steps are deemed
unnecessary here.
The belief in the doctrine of atmospheric contagion is hurtful to the
patient by its direct influence on his mind, and the gratification of
his wishes.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account