An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ...Wright, Thomas
Philosophy
An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ...
Wright, Thomas
Astronomy -- Early works to 1800
If the Stars were ordained merely for the Use of us, why so much
Extravagance and Ostentation in their Number, Nature, and Make? For
a much less Quantity, and smaller Bodies, placed nearer to us, would
every Way answer the vain End we put them to; and besides, in all
Things else, Nature is most frugal, and takes the nearest Way, through
all her Works, to operate and effect the Will of God. It scarce can be
reckoned more irrational, to suppose Animals with Eyes, destined to
live in eternal Darkness, or without Eyes to live in perpetual Day,
than to imagine Space illuminated, where there is nothing to be acted
upon, or brought to Light; therefore we may justly suppose, that so
many radiant Bodies were not created barely to enlighten an infinite
Void, but to make their much more numerous Attendants visible; and
instead of discovering a vast unbounded desolate Negation of Beings,
display an infinite shapeless Universe, crowded with Myriads of
glorious Worlds, all variously revolving round them; and which form
an Atom, to an indefinite Creation, with an inconceivable Variety of
Beings and States, animate and fill the endless Orb of Immensity.
That the sidereal Planets are not visible to us, can be no Objection to
their actual Existence, and being there, is plain from this; it is well
known, that the Stars themselves, which are their Central, and only
radiant Bodies, are little more to us at the Earth, than mathematical
Points. How ridiculous then is it to expect, that any of their small
opaque Attendance, should ever be perceived so far as the Earth by
us; and besides, to show the Impossibility of such a Discovery, we
need only consider, what is, and what is not to be expected, or known
in our own home System. All the Planets in this our sensible Region,
every Astronomer knows, is far from being visible to one another, in
every individual Sphere; for to an Eye at the Orb of _Saturn_, this
Earth we live upon, which requires Years to circumscribe, and Ages to
be made acquainted with, and is far from being yet all known, cannot
possibly from the above Planet be seen: And further, since _Saturn_ and
_Jupiter_, two of the most material and considerable Globes we know of,
except the Sun himself, are Bodies apparently of the same kind, and are
observed to have each a Number of lesser Planets moving round them; why
may we not expect with equal Certainty and Propriety, that all other
Bodies, under the same Circumstances, are in like manner attended; that
is, seeing the Sun is found to be the Center of a System of Bodies, all
variously volving round him? where lies the Improbability of his fellow
Luminaries, the Stars, being surrounded in like sort, with more or less
of such Attendance.
I shall offer but one Thing more to your Consideration in this Affair,
and which I am in great Hopes will be sufficient to make you think
these natural Suggestions a good deal more than probable, and that is
this:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account