An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ...Wright, Thomas
Philosophy
An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ...
Wright, Thomas
Astronomy -- Early works to 1800
The modern Astronomers having, in a great measure, proved that the
Stars are, in all respects, vast Globes of Fire like our Sun. Let us
suppose a new-created Mind, or thinking Being, in a profound State of
Ignorance, with regard to the Nature of all external Objects, but fully
endowed with every human Sense and Force of Reason, suspended in Æther,
exactly in the midway, betwixt [T]_Syrius_ and the Sun; in which Case,
both of these Luminaries would equally appear much about the Brightness
of the largest of our Planets. Now should such a Being, determined
either by Accident or Choice, arrive at this our System of the Sun, and
seeing all the planetary Bodies moving round him, I would ask you what
you think he would imagine to be round _Syrius_? Your Answer, I think I
may venture to say, would not be _nothing_; and methinks I already hear
you say, Why Planets such as ours.
[Footnote T: A Star of the first Magnitude in the greater _Dog_, and
the most neighbouring to our Sun.]
PLATE XI.
Is designed as a geometrical Scale to all the primary Parts of the
visible Creation, with regard to the Distance of Orbits compared with
the Globe of the Sun; by which at once may be conceived, and justly
measured in the Mind, not only the mean Distance of the Planets with
regard to one another, but also that of the Comets, and even the
comparative Distances of the nearest of the Stars, which will, I guess,
greatly help you to form an Idea of the vast Extent of Space necessary
to comprehend the whole Creation.
_Fig._ 1. Is a Radius of the Orbit of _Mercury_, in true Proportion to
the Body of the Sun represented at S, shewing at the same time a small
Portion of the opaque Planet's Orbit, and the real Length of its Shadow
at P.
_Fig._ 2. Is a Radius of the whole System of the Planets as far as the
Orbit of _Saturn_ in Proportion to a compleat Orbit of _Mercury_, much
less than the former; the former serving as a better known Scale to
consider the amazing Distances of the more remote Planets by.
Lastly, _Fig._ 3. Is a Representation of the least possible Distance of
_Syrius_ and the Sun, proportionable to the Magnitude of the Sphere of
our Comets, &_c._ represented at S, whereby it evidently appears, that
as all the Planets of _Syrius_ must be included within the small Sphere
represented in the Center P, none of them could possibly be seen at the
Sun, not only by reason of the Smallness of the Angle of Sustension, or
Elongation, but also as being lost in the superior Light of _Syrius_
himself, in so minute an Orb of Vicinity.
Consequently (as you must perceive) no Arguments can possibly be drawn
to deny the Existence of such Bodies, with any Shew of Reason, from
their not having been seen by us.
Here I must observe to you, that you cannot consider this Scale of
Orbits too much before you look upon Plate XVII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account