Anatomy and Embalming: A Treatise on the Science and Art of Embalming, the Latest and Most Successful Methods of Treatment and the General Anatomy Relating to this Subject — John Shaqi
Anatomy and Embalming: A Treatise on the Science and Art of Embalming, the Latest and Most Successful Methods of Treatment and the General Anatomy Relating to this SubjectNunnamaker, Albert John
Science
Anatomy and Embalming: A Treatise on the Science and Art of Embalming, the Latest and Most Successful Methods of Treatment and the General Anatomy Relating to this Subject
Nunnamaker, Albert John
Embalming
=Jews.=—The Jewish people, who, like others, testified their respect
for the dead, never admit the care of embalming the body as a common
usage. Thus Abraham purchased the field where Sarah was buried;
Joseph had the body of his father magnificently embalmed; Moses only
carried away the bones of Joseph; David praised the people of Gilead,
for having buried with pomp Saul and his sons, etc. In most of these
examples, no mention is made of embalming; nevertheless, the body of
Jesus Christ was embalmed. It is written that Joseph of Arimathea,
a secret disciple, and Nicodemus, ministered unto him, after the
crucifixion, and that 100 lbs. of myrrh and aloes were used. In this
action the greatest secrecy had been observed, for “when the Sabbath
was over, very early on the first day of the next week, came the
faithful women who had loved him, with spices and ointment they had
prepared where with to annoint him, not knowing that, already, this
loving service had been performed by the hand of pious affection.”
The following is nearly the method used by the Jews: Each sex took
care of its dead; they first of all, close the mouth and eyes of the
exposed person, afterward they washed the body and then rubbed it with
perfumes, tied it with bands, and then bandaged it in several cloths of
very fine linen or woolen; and finally, they put it into the sepulture.
It is thought that the myrrh and aloes which they employed had very
little virtue to resist putrefaction, and that the great quantities of
aromatics which they consumed, was rather for pomp, than for the long
preservation of the subject. They took no pains to dry the body; they
did not take away the intestines, and in spite of all these odoriferous
drugs, decomposition must have soon revealed itself as was testified by
the body of Lazarus when resurrected.
=Persians.=—Neither did the Persians possess a very great knowledge
of preservation. Cyrus, King of Persia, said to his children: “when I
have ceased to live, place my body neither in silver nor in gold, nor
in any other coffin, but return it immediately to the earth, etc.” It
will be perceived that Cyrus, in forbidding that any care should be
taken with his body, does not allude to embalming, which, of all other
means, would have been the most efficient in preventing its elements
from returning to the Common Mother.
=Babylonians.=—The Babylonians, anointed the bodies of their dead
with honey, after which, they were immersed in the same substance. It
is highly improbable that this process was successful for long time
preservation, for the preservative power of honey was only equal to its
ability to keep the air from the body.
=Scythians.=—The Scythians coated the bodies of their dead with
wax. This process could not have been successful excepting to retard
decomposition through shutting off all communication between the body
and the air.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account