[12] Wilkins (note _ad loc._) evidently takes _composite_ in a general sense as referring to composition (_dispositio_, _collocatio_); for he says: “The definition includes all the five main divisions of oratory,” and _dispositio_ is not otherwise mentioned. But for the apparent intention to include all five parts, _composite_ would more readily suggest _compositio_, which is the technical name for sentence movement, one of the subdivisions of _elocutio_. _Compositio_ is consistently used in this special sense; but whether _composite_ is so meant here or not, Cicero intended four of the five parts, if not five; and that suffices to establish his allusion to the traditional division. The issue between Crassus and Antonius has little to do with _dispositio_; it concerns the scope of _inventio_. For the division of rhetoric see pages 21, 65, the table in foot-note 1a to Chapter V, and Wilkins’s introduction, page 57. [13] I. xvi. [14] xviii. [15] xix. 86. [16] 87. [17] xx. 91. [18] 92. [19] _disertus._ I. xxi. 94. [20] _Eloquentem vero qui mirabilius et magnificentius augere posset atque ornare quæ vellet, omnisque omnium rerum, quæ ad dicendum pertinerent fontis animo ac memoria contineret._ [21] I. xxv-xxxv. [22] xxxiii. 149 seq. [23] xxxvi-xlvii. [24] xlix. 213. _Oratorem autem, quoniam de eo quærimus, equidem non facio eundem quem Crassus, qui mihi visus est omnem omnium rerum atque artium scientiam comprehendere uno oratoris officio ac nomine; atque eum puto esse qui et verbis ad audiendum iucundis et sententiis ad probandum accommodatis uti possit in causis forensibus atque communibus: hunc ego appello oratorem eumque esse præterea instructum voce et actione et lepore quodam volo._ [25] lxi. 260. [26] xxiv-lxxi. [27] lxxii-lxxxv. [28] lxxxvi-lxxxviii. [29] xx. 84. [30] _Animus acer et præsens et acutus idem atque versutus invictos viros efficit._ [31] xxi. 88. [32] xxii. [33] Tacitus (_Dial._ 34) says that the older method (of Cicero’s time), supplanted in his own time by the schools of the _declamatores_, was apprenticeship. [34] xxiv. 99. [35] xxiv. 101. [36] 102. [37] 103. [38] xxiv-xxvi, 104-110. For the more detailed presentation of Quintilian see Chapter iv, page 74. [39] xxv. 108. [40] xxvii. 114. [41] Hendrickson (Amer. Journ. Philol. xxvi. 260) finds this threefold division first here. The usual terms are _docere_, _conciliare_, _movere_. [42] xxvii. 117. [43] xxx. 132. [44] xxxi. 133. [45] xxxviii. 157. [46] xxxix. cf. above, xxvii. 117. [47] xlii-lxxi. [48] xlii. 178. [49] xliii. 182. [50] xlv. 190. [51] xlvi. 191. [52] xlix-liii. 213. [53] liii. 214. [54] liv-lxxi. [55] lxxii-lxxxv. [56] lxxvi. [57] lxxvii. [58] lxxviii. [59] lxxix. [60] lxxx. [61] lxxxii-lxxxv. [62] lxxxvi-lxxxviii. [63] lxxxviii. 359. _verborum memoria, quæ minus est nobis necessaria ... rerum memoria propria est oratoris._ [64] xv-xxxvi. [65] xxxviii-xlii. [66] xliii-liv. [67] lvi-lxi. [68] x. 37.