Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative worksBaldwin, Charles Sears
History
Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative works
Baldwin, Charles Sears
Classical literature -- History and criticism -- Theory, etc.; Poetics -- History -- To 1500; Rhetoric, Ancient
That such associations are natural is obvious, Dionysius thinks, from
onomatopœia, the earliest and simplest form of sound-connotation in
words. But he does not shrink from pushing his doctrine far beyond this
to the conclusion that sound effects both subtle and various may be
achieved, and should be consciously sought, by literary art.
The conclusion is inevitable, that style is beautiful when
it contains beautiful words, that beauty of words is due to
beautiful syllables and letters, that language is rendered
charming by the things that charm the ear in virtue of
affinities in words, syllables, and letters....
If, then, it were possible that all the parts of speech by
which a given subject is to be expressed should be euphonious
and elegant, it would be madness to seek out inferior ones. But
if this be out of the question, as in many cases it is, then
we must endeavor to mask the natural defects of the inferior
letters by interweaving and mingling and juxtaposition.[35]
The following instances of poetic effects gained by apt combinations of
proper names that have no such suggestions singly will remind English
readers of certain sonorous passages in Milton.[36]
That the connotation of such combinations is due to their syllabic
quality, however, as distinct from their rhythm, Dionysius hardly
succeeds in establishing. The doctrine is flatly denied by Lewis.
A certain learned and well-known student of verse says that
(for example) gutturals and sibilants express “amazement,
affright, indignation, contempt,” and he cites as an
illustration a passage from Paradise Lost.
Out of my sight, thou serpent; that name best
Befits thee with him leagued, thyself as false
And hateful; nothing wants but that thy shape
Like his and color serpentine may show
Thy inward fraud.
One objection to this kind of doctrine is that it makes people
think they have no ear for verse, for after careful reading
they are still uncertain whether they can detect the effect
described. Another objection to it is that it is not true.
Compare with the lines quoted this little song from Browning’s
Pippa Passes:
The year’s at the spring,
And day’s at the morn;
Morning’s at seven;
The hill-side’s dew-pearled;
The lark’s on the wing;
The snail’s on the thorn;
God’s in his heaven—
All’s right with the world.
This is shorter by four syllables than the passage from Milton,
but it has the same number of gutturals and two more sibilants;
yet fancy describing it as an expression of “amazement,
affright, indignation, contempt!”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account