But whence come those disgusting beings, whose name alone inspires us with horror, and which instal themselves without ceremony, not in our dwellings, but in our organs, and which we find it more difficult to expel than rats or mice? They all derive their existence from their parents. The time has passed when a vitiated condition of the humours, or the deterioration of the parenchyma was considered a sufficient cause for the formation of parasites, and when their presence was regarded as an extraordinary phenomenon resulting from the morbid dispositions of the organism. We have reason to hope that this language will, during the next generation, have entirely disappeared from works on physiology and pathology. Neither the temperament nor the humours have any influence on parasites, and they are not more abundant in delicate individuals than in those who enjoy the most robust health. On the contrary, all wild animals harbour their parasitical worms, and the greater part of them have not lived long in captivity, before nematode and cestode worms completely disappear. It is only the imprisoned parasites which do not desert them. All these mutual adaptations are pre-arranged, and as far as we are concerned, we cannot divest ourselves of the idea that the earth has been prepared successively for plants, animals, and man. When God first elaborated matter, He had evidently that being in view who was intended at some future day to raise his thoughts to Him, and do Him homage. This is the answer which I would give to the question recently xxvii propounded by Mons. L. Agassiz. "Were the physical changes to which our globe has been subjected effected for the sake of the animal world, considered in its relations from the very beginning, or are the modifications of animals the result of physical changes?" in other words, has the earth been made and prepared for living beings, or have living beings been as highly developed as was possible, according to the physical vicissitudes of the planet which they inhabit? This question has always been discussed, and that science which cannot look beyond its scalpel, will never succeed in resolving it. Each one must seek by his own reason the solution of the great problem. When we see the newly-born colt eagerly seeking for its mother's teats, the chick as soon as it is hatched beginning to peck, or the duckling seeking its puddle of water, can we recognize anything but instinct as the cause of these actions, and is not this instinct the libretto written by Him who has forgotten nothing?