Animals' Rights Considered in Relation to Social Progress — John Shaqi
Animals' Rights Considered in Relation to Social ProgressSalt, Henry S.
Philosophy
Animals' Rights Considered in Relation to Social Progress
Salt, Henry S.
Animal rights; Animal rights -- Bibliography; Vivisection; Vivisection -- Bibliography
As for the nonsense sometimes talked about the beneficial effects of
those field-sports which bring men into contact with the sublimities
of nature, the dynamiters who used to cross the ocean to blow up an
English town might on this principle have justified the object of their
journey by the assertion that the sea-voyage brought them in contact
with the exalting and ennobling influence of the Atlantic.[33]
As the case stands between the sportsman and his victims, there cannot
be much doubt as to whence the benefits proceed, and from which party
the gratitude is due.
“Woe to the ungrateful!” says Michelet. “By this phrase I mean the
sporting crowd, who, unmindful of the numerous benefits we owe to the
animals, exterminate innocent life. A terrible sentence weighs on the
tribes of sportsmen--they can create nothing. They originate no art,
no industry.... It is a shocking and hideous thing to see a child
partial to sport; to see woman enjoying and admiring murder, and
encouraging her child. That delicate and sensitive woman would not
give him a knife, but she gives him a gun.”
The sports of hunting and coursing are a brutality which could not be
tolerated for a day in a state which possessed anything more than the
mere name of justice, freedom, and enlightenment. Sir Thomas More says
of his model citizens in “Utopia:”
“Nor can they comprehend the pleasure of seeing dogs run after a hare
more than of seeing one dog run after another; for if the seeing them
run is that which gives the pleasure, you have the same entertainment
to the eye on both these occasions, since that is the same in both
cases; but if the pleasure lies in seeing the hare killed and torn by
the dogs, this ought rather to stir pity, that a weak, harmless, and
fearful hare should be devoured by strong, fierce, and cruel dogs.”
To be accurate, the zest of sport lies neither in the running nor the
killing, as such, but in the excitement caused by the fact that a
life (some one else’s life) is at stake, that the pursuer is matched
in a fierce game of hazard against the pursued. The opinion has been
expressed, by one well qualified to speak with authority on the
subject, that “well-laid drags, tracked by experts, would test the
mettle both of hounds and riders to hounds; but then a terrified,
palpitating, fleeing life would not be struggling ahead, and so the
idea is not pleasing to those who find pleasure in blood.”[34]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account