Aphrodisiacs and Anti-aphrodisiacs: Three Essays on the Powers of Reproduction — John Shaqi
Aphrodisiacs and Anti-aphrodisiacs: Three Essays on the Powers of ReproductionDavenport, John
Philosophy
Aphrodisiacs and Anti-aphrodisiacs: Three Essays on the Powers of Reproduction
Davenport, John
Phallicism; Sex; Sex customs -- France -- History -- 17th century
The worship of Priapus among the Romans was derived from the Egyptians,
who, under the form of Apis, the sacred Bull, worshipped the generative
power of nature; and, as the syllable _pri_ or _pre_ signifies, in the
Oriental tongue, _principle_, production, or natural or original source,
the word _Priapus_ may be translated _principle of production_ or of
_fecundation of Apis_. The same symbol also bore among the Romans the
names of _Tutunus_, _Mutinus_, and _Fascinum_. Among the many places
where this divinity was worshipped, Lampsacus,[15] in Asia Minor, was
the most noted on account of the obscene rites there practised. The
Priapi were of different forms; some having only a human head and the
Phallus; some with the head of Pan or of a faun--that is, with the head
and ears of a goat.[16] Others, with their indecent attribute, were
placed in the public roads, and were then confounded with the divinities
_Mercury_ and _Terminus_, who presided over boundaries. Scaliger says
that he saw at Rome, in the palace of a cardinal,[17] a similar statue,
whose phallus had served as a sign post.[18] All the human part of these
Priapi were invariably painted red.[19]
When furnished with arms, which he was when representing Terminus,
Priapus held in one hand a reaping hook, and, like Osiris, grasped with
the other the characteristic feature of his divinity, which was always
of a monstrous size and in a state of energy.
In the towns, Priapus had public chapels, whither such devotees as were
suffering from maladies connected with his attributes repaired for the
purpose of offering to him _ex-votos_ representing the parts afflicted;
these ex-votos being sometimes paintings and, at others, little figures
made of wax or of wood, and occasionally, even of marble.
Females as superstitious, as they were lascivious, might be seen
offering in public to Priapus, as many garlands as they had had lovers.
These they would hang upon the enormous phallus of the idol, which was
often hidden from sight by the number suspended by only one woman.
Others offered to the god as many phalli, made of the wood of the willow
tree, as they had vanquished men in a single night.
St. Augustine informs us that it was considered by the Roman ladies as a
very proper and pious custom to require young brides to seat themselves
upon the monstrous and obscene member of Priapus: and Lactantius says,
"Shall I speak of that _Mutinus_, upon the extremity of which brides are
accustomed to seat themselves in order that the god may appear to have
been the first to receive the sacrifice of their modesty?"[20]
These facts prove that the worship of Priapus had greatly degenerated
with the Romans, since, losing sight altogether of the object typified,
they attach themselves to the symbol alone, in which they could see only
what was indecent; and hence religion became a pretext for
libertinism.[21]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account