Aphrodisiacs and Anti-aphrodisiacs: Three Essays on the Powers of ReproductionDavenport, John
Philosophy
Aphrodisiacs and Anti-aphrodisiacs: Three Essays on the Powers of Reproduction
Davenport, John
Phallicism; Sex; Sex customs -- France -- History -- 17th century
Respected so long as the Roman manners preserved their pristine
simplicity, but degraded[22] and vilified in proportion as the morals of
that people became corrupted, the very sanctuary itself of Priapus
failed to protect him from obloquy and ridicule. Christian writers added
their indignant invectives to the biting sarcasms of the poets, and the
worship of Priapus would have been annihilated had not superstition and
the force of habit, that most indestructible of all human affections,
come to the rescue. These two powerful levers of mankind triumphed over
reason and Christianity, and succeeded, notwithstanding the strenuous
and continued efforts of the latter, in maintaining in some degree the
worship of that filthy deity; for the Christian priests, while opposing
_à l'outrance_, the superstitions and impure practices already adverted
to, did not so do, as regarded the other customs equally repugnant to
decency and true religion. Less austere to these, and consulting their
own interests, they turned to their profit the ancient worship
established by the Romans and strengthened by habit: they appropriated
to themselves what they could not destroy, and, in order to attract to
their side the votaries of Priapus, they made a Christian of him.
But besides the Lingham of the Indians, the Phallus of the Greeks, and
the Priapus of the Romans, the Cross ([Symbol: Tau]), although generally
thought to be exclusively emblematical of eternal life, has also an
account of its fancied similarity to the _membrum virile_, been
considered by many as typical of the reproductive powers of nature. It
was known as such to the Indians, being as common in their country as in
Egypt or in Europe.[23] "Let not the piety of the Catholic Christian,"
says the Rev. Mr. Maurice, "be offended at the preceding assertion that
the Cross was one of the most usual symbols among the hieroglyphics of
Egypt and India. Equally honoured in the Gentile and the world, this
Christian emblem of universal nature, of that world to whose four
corners its diverging radii pointed, decorated the hands of most of the
sculptured images in the former country (Egypt), and the latter (India)
stamped its form upon the most majestic of the shrines of their
deities."
[Illustration: PLATE V., Figs. 1-3, THREE HEADED OSIRIS.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account