Aphrodisiacs and Anti-aphrodisiacs: Three Essays on the Powers of ReproductionDavenport, John
Philosophy
Aphrodisiacs and Anti-aphrodisiacs: Three Essays on the Powers of Reproduction
Davenport, John
Phallicism; Sex; Sex customs -- France -- History -- 17th century
From the investigations and researches of the learned, there appears to
be no doubt but that the most ancient of all superstitions was that in
which Nature was contemplated chiefly under the attribute or property of
fecundity; the symbols of the reproductive power being those under which
its prolific potencies were exhibited. It is not because modern
fastidiousness affects to consider those symbols as indecent, and even
obscene, that we should therefore suppose them to have been so regarded
by the ancients: on the contrary, the view of them awakened no impure
ideas in the minds of the latter, being regarded by them as the most
sacred objects of worship. The ancients, indeed, did not look upon the
pleasures of love with the same eye as the moderns do; the tender union
of the sexes excited their veneration, because religion appeared to
consecrate it, inasmuch as their mythology presented to them all Olympus
as more occupied with amatory delights than with the government of the
universe.
The reflecting men of those times, more simple, but, it must be
confessed, more profound, than those of our own day, could not see any
moral turpitude in actions regarded by them as the design of nature, and
as the acme of felicity. For this reason it is that we find not only
ancient writers expressing themselves freely upon subjects regarded by
us as indecent, but even sculptors and painters equally unrestrained in
this particular.
The statesman took advantage of these religious impressions: whatever
tended to increase population being held in honour. Those images and
Priapi so frequently found in the temples of the ancients, and even in
their houses, and which we consider as objects of indecent lewdness,
were, in their eyes, but so many sacred motives exciting them to
propagate their species.
In order to represent by a physical object the reproductive power of the
sun in spring-time, as well as the action of that power on all sentient
beings, the ancients adopted that symbol of the male gender which the
Greeks, who derive it from the Egyptians, called--Phallus.[1] This
worship was so general as to have spread itself over a large portion of
the habitable globe, for it flourished for many ages in Egypt and Syria,
Persia, Asia Minor, Greece and Italy: it was, and still is, in vigour in
India and many parts of Africa, and was even found in America on its
discovery by the Spaniards. Thus Garcilaso de la Vega informs us[2]
that, in the public squares of Panuco (a Mexican town), _bas-reliefs_
were found which, like those of India, represented, in various ways the
sexual union; while at Tlascala, another town of that country, the
reproductive act was worshipped under the joint symbol of the generative
organs, male and female.
A more surprising fact is, that this worship has, as will be shewn
hereafter, been perpetuated to a very late date, among the Christians of
Europe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account