Apollonius : $b or, The present and future of psychical researchBennett, E. N. (Ernest Nathaniel), Sir
Science
Apollonius : $b or, The present and future of psychical research
Bennett, E. N. (Ernest Nathaniel), Sir
Parapsychology
Yet side by side with this moderate and reasonable resolution we find
that the Conference registered a very strong warning against “the habit
of recourse to _séances_ and mediums”. Here again is revealed once
more the ignorance of many well-meaning and able critics who possess a
merely superficial acquaintance with the subject. How, for example, can
we study scientifically the phenomena of clairvoyance without recourse
to clairvoyant mediums? Such an embargo would――to go no further――have
robbed us of the profoundly interesting records of Mrs Piper’s
trance-mediumship, or the striking results contained in Dr Osty’s
volumes. One might almost as well approve of the scientific study of
anatomy and forbid recourse to the dissecting-room.
* * * * *
At this point, and in view of the admitted imperfections which mark
the course of our inquiry into supernormal phenomena――the fraud and
credulity and malobservation which so easily beset our work――the
question may fairly be asked: “Has psychical research really any
future?”
To such a query I have no hesitation in giving an emphatic “Yes.”
One may go further and say that at no period since the subject was
seriously studied have we had better reasons for such an answer. Within
the last few years a veritable revolution has occurred in the general
attitude of science towards the phenomena of the universe. In the
light of Einstein’s discoveries the dogmatism of the materialist has
become obsolete. The old scientific outlook has been undermined and
superseded by scientists themselves. Atoms and electrons are no longer
regarded as ultimate realities. According to Professor Eddington,
“there is nothing to prevent the assemblage of atoms forming the brain
from being itself a thinking machine in virtue of that nature which
physics leaves undetermined and undeterminable.” Not only the ‘laws of
Nature’ but space and time and the great globe itself may conceivably
be mental phenomena, themselves the creations of mind. And so it has
come to pass that such an utterance as Professor Clifford’s: “The
Universe is made of ether and atoms and there is no room for ghosts”
remains only a fragment of an outworn scientific creed. The division
of the external world into a material world and a spiritual world is
now held by scientists to be superficial. No inherent impossibility
rules out of court the possible manifestations of other minds than
ours, functioning apart from our own brains and bodies. “We may
doubt,” says Professor Eddington, “whether there is any branch of
knowledge from which exact science is excluded”: there _is_ “room for
ghosts,” and room for other supernormal phenomena hitherto ignored or
denied by scientists in general. The fact of telepathy indicates the
existence of other methods of mental communion outside the recognized
channels of sense, and for that reason is rejected _a priori_ by
some of the more conservative representatives of science. “Such a
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account