Archimedes; or, the future of physicsWhyte, Lancelot Law
Philosophy
Archimedes; or, the future of physics
Whyte, Lancelot Law
Physics
It almost always happens that the formulations of genius are
exaggerated and form the basis of a pernicious orthodoxy, and it has
certainly happened to relativity theory. Against a tide of exaggerated
praise Whitehead, Larmor, and Bridgman, as well as some Continental
astronomers, have debated the general assumption that the theory of
relativity is adequate to its task, but those in whose hands the power
of orthodoxy lies have not yet answered their criticisms in print.
Neglect has always been the weapon by which orthodoxy has unknowingly
hindered the advance of new ideas. But while this neglect is easy to
understand, it is really remarkable that the postulates of relativity
theory were not subjected to closer examination before it was made the
basis of wide philosophical speculation. The experimental confirmation
of Einstein’s law of gravitation does not guarantee his postulates,
since Whitehead has reached a similar law (identical within the
accuracy of the observations) from different assumptions.
Einstein’s profound creative intuition and use of a difficult
technique compel our deepest respect, but his work should never have
been regarded as a _general_ theory of time and space. Not only does
he neglect the question of irreversibility but it is very doubtful if
periodic processes can be made to fit into his scheme, as has been
pointed out by Russell and Bridgman during the last year. Probably
Einstein himself has never regarded his theory as more than a stage in
the attempt to create a still wider physical synthesis, and we must
not interpret in a broad sense his statement that one of the demands
of his theory “takes away from space and time the last remnant of
physical objectivity”.[6] This could only be true if physical time
shared the absolute symmetry of space, i.e. if physical processes
were all reversible. But there are processes from which we can obtain
an objective criterion of the direction of time, and hence time does
retain an element of physical objectivity as distinct from the
absolute symmetry of space. One of the most interesting features in the
future of physics will be the explanation of the fact that Einstein
reached a correct law from postulates of limited validity, and in
this connection Whitehead’s alternative derivation may prove to be of
importance.
CHAPTER III
_Time in Astronomy and Physics_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account