Archimedes; or, the future of physicsWhyte, Lancelot Law
Philosophy
Archimedes; or, the future of physics
Whyte, Lancelot Law
Physics
In twenty years’ time scientific knowledge will be adequate for the
beginning of this giant task, and we shall be subscribing our guineas
for the foundation of the Institute. Time has created man; man may use
time to create man once more. With a million years ahead of us before
we reach the sensitive mammals, we need hardly fear criticism from the
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. We are simply going
to allow life to evolve itself under ideal conditions with Switzerland
as the State for Evolutionary Research.
It may happen that under such perfect conditions life will evolve more
swiftly than it did on this rough-and-ready planet. But equally well
we--or rather our descendants--may find that the Darwinian struggle for
survival is essential for evolution, and then the nations would have to
debate on the morals of reproducing the ‘cruelty of nature’ inside the
World’s Evolutionary Zoo. Perhaps a wrathful god will seek to punish
mankind for attempting to build this ladder to the secret of life, this
modern Tower of Babel, and amuse himself by watching the community of
scientists stricken by a plague of inconsistency amongst their weights
and measures.
The possibilities of such grand schemes have to be taken seriously. We
are now highly self-conscious beings with a tremendous technique for
research. Men with genuine creative imagination who reverence life must
shoulder the responsibilities of the twentieth-century consciousness,
and use scientific technique for creative not life-destroying purposes.
One can imagine a growing fraction of the interest now given to
war, other people’s adultery, and greyhound racing, turned towards
Switzerland, whence at critical moments wireless bulletins would
announce that the first amoeba had just successfully taken nourishment.
If we wish it, the future of science can be such as to recompense for
its recent occupation with gunpowder. Governments would be powerless
to make war if the physicists refused to make the guns and the Royal
Society called upon scientists to go on strike until each war crisis
had been settled by arbitration.
The problem of life may be seen in a new light if the speculations of
the last section are accepted and we assume that a definite period
of time is necessary for the building up of any living organism. For
if this is so the laws which govern life must involve the age of the
organism since some definite moment in its history. We might choose for
this moment the instant when the parent spermatozoon entered the ovum
in the case of a higher organism, or in the evolutionary experiment
just described the age might be reckoned from the moment when the first
elementary chemicals were combined into molecules. The point is that
this whole evolutionary process must be described by laws which take
into account the age of the system under consideration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account