Archimedes; or, the future of physics — John Shaqi
Archimedes; or, the future of physicsWhyte, Lancelot Law
Philosophy
Archimedes; or, the future of physics
Whyte, Lancelot Law
Physics
Laws of the Newtonian type which Maxwell had in mind assume that
one can adequately describe the present state of a system without
specifying its past history. But we cannot say anything very precise
about the inside of a living organism, and it is found far more
efficient to describe what is known of its past history. We do not try
to say where atoms are in an organism; instead we mention its species,
age, etc. Organisms might be defined as systems whose future behaviour
is more easily estimated from their past history than from what can be
known about their immediate internal structure. The most convenient
formulation of organic laws will therefore be expressed in terms of
the age of the organism and take account of how its life has been
spent. These laws are necessarily irreversible, since the assimilation
of oxygen or food is always going on in a manner which can never be
reversed. Life is like a function which must always alter in one
direction; when this development ceases life has disappeared.
The contrast of living and dead now appears less important than the
following classification of natural processes:
1. Processes which are reversible and whose laws can be expressed
independently of the age of the system, e.g. gravitational and
mechanical motions which do not involve light or heat.
2. Processes which are irreversible, the laws being best expressed in
terms of the total time which has passed since some initial state,
e.g. chemical combination, growth, evolution, radioactivity, and all
changes involving light or heat.
Physics has always asserted that processes of the first type were
fundamental in nature, and astronomy provided the ideal example in
planetary motion. It was this assertion that gave rise to the essential
issue behind the conflict of mechanism and vitalism. But if Born is
right, and the fundamental atomic processes are irreversible, then
the situation is completely altered. There is no longer a question
of life being an arbitrary irruption in a world of mechanical law,
since the laws of gravitation and mechanics must then be looked on as
the limiting case, when the irreversibility is vanishingly small, of
a whole series of irreversible processes which constitute the most
important examples of the fundamental order in nature. This series
would include the atomic processes connected with heat, light, and
electricity, chemical combination, colloidal effects, organic growth
and evolution, and the highly co-ordinated electrical processes which
form the physiological basis of consciousness.
If this view is correct the atomic processes of radiation and chemical
combination should be just what the biologist needs to build up
organisms. Instead of a chaos of little particles obeying inverse
square laws, the modern physicist offers to the biologist a new kind of
atom with electrical and magnetic properties which cause it to build
up stable compounds.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account