But this may take some years, and in the meantime we must look around and see how this issue is affecting current thought. We find the doubt about process presented by Mr Sullivan (in _Gallio_), who has not yet made up his mind to which side science will grant the victory. Thus on one page he writes: “it seems to be true that events do not really take place, we come across them” and suggests that process may be “a totally irrelevant idea when applied to reality”. But later we learn to our surprise that “it seems likely that (in scientific theory) the world will have to be regarded as an evolutionary process, where patterns of value emerge”. However, this inconsistency need not bother us, since we are told that “the teachings of science so far as the spiritual problems of man are concerned are merely irrelevant”. These views reflect perfectly the uncertainty of the time, and will be looked back on as a precious record of the state of mind which preceded the scientific synthesis. Perhaps the most interesting feature of the essay is the indecision it displays with regard to the spiritual importance of science. This is a relic from the days when there were two worlds, the world of science and the world of religion and art. No one ever knew which of these worlds they were living in, and this is no wonder. For the division was made only because at one time it looked as though the scientific method could only deal with _quantities_, and therefore that science could have nothing to say about values or qualities. This view is no longer tenable. For instance, there is a quality in organic integration which most of us value, and without this and many other such conceptions biology and psychology could not get far.