Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, on H. R. 11943, to Amend Title 60, Chapter 3, of the Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to Copyrights: May 2, 1906. — John Shaqi
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, on H. R. 11943, to Amend Title 60, Chapter 3, of the Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to Copyrights: May 2, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, on H. R. 11943, to Amend Title 60, Chapter 3, of the Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to Copyrights: May 2, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. TINDALE. It states it in a positive manner instead of a negative
manner.
The CHAIRMAN. Let me ask you how it gives any notice whatever that the
purchaser can not rent or lend the book?
Mr. TINDALE. It says that the performing rights are given only by
purchase of this copy.
The CHAIRMAN. But the original purchaser purchases a copy for every
single member of the chorus.
Mr. TINDALE. Then we have no objection.
The CHAIRMAN. No objection to their loaning them? Then we can fix this
in a moment. I want to ask where there is anything in that notice that
would give notice to the purchaser that he could not rent or loan those
books?
Mr. SERVEN. He may loan or rent or do what he pleases, but the fellow
that borrows is the fellow that that notice affects.
The CHAIRMAN. Not at all.
Mr. SERVEN. It is the fellow that wants to give the public performance.
The CHAIRMAN. You call attention to a certain section of the Revised
Statutes, and that has nothing to do with this matter at all--the very
section you call attention to.
Mr. SERVEN. Even with such a notice, it strikes me that that does not
affect what the law does require.
The CHAIRMAN. That is not the question. What the committee is getting
at is whether you give the people you sell these books to any notice at
all that they can not rent them?
Mr. CHANEY. What information would that notice give them?
Mr. TINDALE. I take it that they would have notice that they had to do
something, Mr. Tams having bought the copy.
The CHAIRMAN. I am not talking about Mr. Tams at all; I am trying to
find out whether there is any notice to any musical society--whether
there is any warning that they must not lend these books?
Mr. TINDALE. The warning consists in the word "only"--can only be
secured; and more recent copies----
The CHAIRMAN. I am not talking about the people that borrow; I am
talking about the people that lend--the church society that buys the
copies. Is there anything in that notice that would caution them that
they must not lend these books?
Mr. TINDALE. The notice has to speak for itself. We think that is a
warning.
Mr. SERVEN. We have no objection to the lending; that is not our point;
it is the public performance from the copy that is loaned.
Mr. WEBB. For charity or profit or any reason?
Mr. SERVEN. For any purpose. It is the public performance that is the
thing we object to.
The CHAIRMAN. What do you think the public would borrow these for if
not for public performance?
Mr. SERVEN. They might want to look at them; somebody might borrow it
to look it over.
The CHAIRMAN. I don't think they would borrow many copies for that.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account