Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
The copyright fees are not, however, the most valuable assets of
the office. During the year the articles deposited and credited
numbered 213,498 articles. This large deposit of books,
periodicals, maps, music, engravings, photographs, etc., includes
many articles of considerable value which the Library of Congress
would otherwise be required to purchase, and these articles
therefore represent an annual acquisition of property to the value
of many thousands of dollars.
Mr. CHANEY. But they do not produce any money.
Mr. REMICH. They do not produce any money--that is so; but they save
you making an appropriation. This saves the Appropriations Committees
of both House and Senate from appropriating money each year to buy
these things that you would otherwise have to buy to place upon the
shelves of the Library. Now, I want to do my share, and I want my
business to do its share, toward supporting this Government. But I do
not think, in view of this report, that there is any good reason why
this great, rich Government should place this increased burden upon
our industry.
Mr. CHANEY. Do you not argue unfairly when you undertake to bring in
the Library as against the proposition?
Mr. REMICH. I am not trying to bring in the Library as against the
proposition. Every author has to file two copies of his book, and they
are placed in the Library. I say that if they did not do that, Mr.
Putnam, the Librarian, would have to take money out of his
appropriation and buy these books. I should suppose that that would be
so. Otherwise he would not say that they were of great value. I am
willing, if they want to make a certificate of every view we have and
send to us, for any convenience of the office, to take them; but to
force us to pay for thousands and thousands of certificates, which
will make it impossible for us to make a profit in the manufacture of
our goods at the close margin under which the business is conducted
under our contracts, would be a hardship, and I do not believe you
want to drive us out of business in that way.
Mr. CHANEY. We certainly do not want to drive you out of business.
Mr. REMICH. It seems to me that it would have that effect.
Mr. CHANEY. But I take it that the Librarian's purpose was to try to
make this thing pay its way.
Mr. REMICH. I have no doubt about that. Mr. Putnam and Mr. Solberg
have told me that by this consolidation of subjects many certificates
could be saved. I should be glad to comply with their suggestion if
our business was of such a character that we could do this series
work; but you can see the difficulties.
Mr. PUTNAM. We want to be as clear as possible, and to meet this
difficulty. Let me ask you this: Do you not do any series work, or is
it only that you do not do work in a series under this limitation as
to pose or composition?
Mr. REMICH. We do not do that class of work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account