Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906. — John Shaqi
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
The league had stood for a copyright commission instead of this
conference. But when we find this bill, sir, presented as the result of
only a year's work, and remember that the English copyright commission
took years to produce a draft which has not yet, after nearly a
generation, been enacted into law, we can not but express the greatest
satisfaction with the result now before you. We do not feel, sir, that
any bill can be presented to your committee which does not call for the
most careful consideration, for protest from outside interests, and for
discussion, not only in your committee and in the halls of Congress,
but throughout the public. We do not feel that any such bill would be
possible; and I wish very heartily, sir, to record the American
copyright league as favoring the fullest discussion and the fullest
consideration of any of what may be called the minority interests. We
believe that the interests of the office are perfectly consistent with
the interests of the public; and in that view, sir, we support most
heartily, individually and as members of the conference, the bill which
you have before you.
STATEMENT OF FRANK D. MILLET.
Mr. MILLET. I shall have very little to say, Mr. Chairman. The artists
are interested in this bill because, as the committee undoubtedly
understands, the copyright of a picture is often, almost always, more
valuable to the artist than the original work--that is, of greater
money value. We have had long experience with the law, and we have not
found that we have been protected. So little protection has been
afforded that it is no longer the habit for the artist to copyright his
picture. We have gone out of the business of copyrighting, practically,
as you will find if you will go to any exhibition, because we have not
been able to get any relief in case our work had been infringed upon.
We have always objected to the copyright notice which we have been
obliged to put on the picture, because it is considered a
disfigurement. That is another reason why we have not copyrighted. That
has been a very great loss to us as a class. That has been one of the
reasons why we prefer, many of us, to spend much of our time abroad.
If you will pardon me for a moment I will give a personal instance.
I have painted in England and in Europe over twenty years. I never had
one bit of difficulty with my copyrights over there, and I have had
considerable income from my copyrights; and I think $7 or $8 is about
all the money I have ever gotten in America out of copyrights here.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account