Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906. — John Shaqi
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Since the conferences began last winter two of my pictures have been
reproduced by a journal in New York, one of them in color. They cut off
my name and copyrighted the picture themselves. In the case of the
other they left my copyright on and published it without my consent. I
have absolutely no redress, because the law says that I can get a
dollar for every copy found in their possession, and they were not
fools enough to have any copies in their possession, of course. I
relate this little personal tale, because that is what has been the
experience of all the artists, painters, and sculptors.
We do not pretend to say that this bill, in these particular cases, or
in the first case of notice, meets our highest desire, because we would
like to have it exactly as it is abroad, no notice being required
whatever. But we met our friends, our dearest foes, the reproducers,
and made this compromise, which is satisfactory to us on the question
of the notice, as to what we shall put on the picture without
disfigurement, and we think that the bill is the best one that we could
possibly agree to, and we are all of us fully in favor of the bill as
it stands.
I thank you.
Mr. SULZER. Is the bill as it is drawn at present satisfactory to you?
Mr. MILLET. It is satisfactory to us.
Mr. SULZER. And you want it passed just as it is?
Mr. MILLET. We would like to have it passed as it is.
Mr. SULZER. That would protect the artists?
Mr. MILLET. As far as we can make out, that would protect us.
Mr. CURRIER. Is it the criminal remedy that is provided by this bill
that would give the protection you need?
Mr. MILLET. That is one of the things.
Mr. BONYNGE. What are the new remedies given to the artists by the
provisions of this bill?
Mr. MILLET. At the end of the bill you will find them.
Mr. CHANEY. Just state them from memory.
Mr. MILLET. There is a misdemeanor clause that we are very keen on, the
same as for the dramatists. We do not see why it should not be a
misdemeanor, to apply to us as well as to the dramatists--sections 23
and 25.
STATEMENT OF JOHN PHILIP SOUSA.
Mr. SOUSA. Mr. Chairman, I would much rather have my brass band here. I
think it would be more appreciated than my words will be. [Laughter.]
Mr. CHANEY. We would rather have you, just now.
Mr. SOUSA. Thank you.
Mr. Chairman, I would like to quote Fletcher, of Saltoun, who said that
he cared not who made the laws of the land if he could write its songs.
We composers of America take the other view. We are very anxious as to
who makes the laws of this land. We are in a very bad way. I think when
the old copyright law was made, the various perforated rolls and
phonograph records were not known, and there was no provision made to
protect us in that direction. Since then, the talking machines have
come out, and the claim is made that the record of sound is not a
notation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account