Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906. — John Shaqi
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
The bill attempts to be both. It is, as you see, divided into eight
chapters, with some supplementary miscellaneous provisions. I say that
it is divided into chapters--that is, recited in the contents of the
bill as printed officially and set forth in marginal references in the
bill as printed at the Library. These chapters deal with the nature and
extent of copyright, the subject-matter of copyright, who may obtain
copyright, how to secure it, the duration of it, the protection and the
transfer of copyright, and the copyright office.
I have furnished to your committee some analysis of it. That analysis
is contained in the printed statement marked "Memorandum," of which
there are additional copies here dated June 5, including those before
you, containing some slight changes from those sent out to members of
your committee. I would ask to have this one, dated on the outside June
5, considered the recent one.
(The memorandum above referred to was, by direction of the committee,
made a part of the record, and the same is as follows:)
MEMORANDUM.
A.--_Some leading features._
As the present law consists of but a group of statutes, and
the proposed bill is systematic and organic in form, the changes
which it introduces other than mere abrogations are not easily
explained by mere reference to the existing statutes. Throughout
attempt has been made to substitute general terms for particular
specifications, to provide for a protection as broad as the
Constitution contemplated, and to insure that no specification
shall tend to limit unduly either subject-matter or the protection.
Important respects in which the bill modifies or amplifies existing
law are as follows:
_Nature and extent._--Section 1, like section 9, is fundamental.
The existing law (Rev. Stat., sec. 4952) specifies as the exclusive
right "the sole liberty of printing, reprinting, publishing,
completing, copying, executing, finishing, and vending;" of public
performance or representation; and of dramatization or translation.
The bill omits the specifications "printing, reprinting,
publishing, completing, executing, and finishing," but attempts
others intended to be fully as broad. [Please see sec. 1.] It adds
the right of oral delivery in the case of lectures, and the right
to make, sell, distribute, or let for hire any device, etc.,
especially adapted to reproduce to the ear any musical work, and to
reproduce it to the ear by means of such a device; but these latter
are limited to works hereafter published and copyrighted.
The copyright is to protect "all the copyrightable component parts
of the work copyrighted and any and all reproductions or copies
thereof in whatever form, style, or size."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account