Poets, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Shelley, Percy Bysshe, 1792-1822
Harriet, at Greystoke, bore herself with grace. The Duchess, who had
been told the story of Shelley’s extraordinary marriage, was agreeably
surprised by the beauty and good manners of his wife. Even Eliza was
considered “quite charming,” at least according to Harriet. The visit
was successful. When Mr. Westbrook knew that his daughters had stayed
with a duke, and that his son-in-law had arrived at the castle with only
a guinea in his pocket, he felt the sudden need to show himself
generous, and he offered the young couple an allowance of £200 a year.
Mr. Shelley could not be less open-handed, above all when his suzerain
and chief asked him to be clement. He agreed once more to allow his son
£200 a year: and thus all danger of poverty came to an end.
But in Percy’s eyes the chief satisfaction lay in having obtained these
important results without any concessions on his part: “I think it my
duty to say that however great advantages might result from such
concessions I can make no promise of concealing my opinions in political
or religious matters. . . . Such methods as these would be unworthy of
us both.” His father answered: “If I make you an allowance it is simply
to prevent you from swindling strangers.” So incapable was he of rising
to the height of Shelley’s ideas.
* * *
At Greystoke Shelley made acquaintance with William Calvert, a friend of
Southey’s, who offered to take him to call on the poet. Thus, for the
first time, he was to see in the flesh one of the writers he most
admired. But when he actually met Southey he was intensely surprised,
for he had always associated the idea of a poet with the most entrancing
and aerial of beings.
What he found, in a well-furnished and well-warmed house, was a Mrs.
Southey resembling far more a cook-housekeeper than a Muse. She had been
in point of fact a dressmaker, and she bound her husband’s books with
remnants of the gowns she had made. Her linen-closets were the
sanctuaries in which she exercised her talents, and her conversation was
of money, cooking, and servants, like the most boring of housewives. The
poet seemed insensible to the ignominy of it all. He was an honest
creature, but with no reasoning powers. He admitted the social system
needed changing, but declared that change could only come very slowly.
He made use of the odious formula, “Neither you nor I will live to see
it.” He was opposed to Catholic Emancipation and Parliamentary reform.
Worst of all, he called himself a Christian! Grieved to the heart,
Shelley left him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account