Arminell: A Social Romance, Vol. 1Baring-Gould, S. (Sabine)
General
Arminell: A Social Romance, Vol. 1
Baring-Gould, S. (Sabine)
English fiction -- 19th century
It was open to bachelors to migrate to America, but what were the
married men to do? The captain would feel the stoppage of the mine most
of all. He had kept the accounts of the output, had paid the wages, and
sold the metal. The miners might, indeed, take temporary work on the new
line in course of construction, but that meant a change of life from one
that was regular, whilst living in settled homes, to a wandering
existence, to makeshift housing, separation from their families, and to
association with demoralising and lawless companions. The captain,
however, had not this chance within reach. He could not migrate, because
he possessed the little house in which he lived, together with an acre
of garden ground beside it, which his father had enclosed and reclaimed.
Moreover, he was not likely to find work which gave him a situation of
authority and superiority. Instead of being a master he must be
content—if he found employ—to work as a servant. Hitherto, he had
engaged and dismissed the hands, now he must become a hand—and be glad
to be one—liable to dismissal.
It was natural that the men, and especially Saltren, should feel keenly
and resent the closing of the mine. People see things as they affect
themselves, and appreciate them only as they relate to their own
affairs. I knew a man named Balhatchet who patented a quack medicine
which he called his Heal-all, and this man never could be brought to see
that the Fall of Man was a disaster to humanity, for, he argued, if
there had been no fall, then no sickness, and therefore no place for
Balhatchet’s Heal-all.
According to “The Spectator,” when the news reached London that the King
of France was dead, “Now we shall have fish cheaper,” was the greeting
the tidings evoked. The miners were angry with the bleachers, because
they used German manganese instead of that raised in England, and angry
with the shippers for bringing it across the sea. But above all, at this
time, they were inclined to resent the action of Lord Lamerton in
closing the mine, for by so doing he was, as they put it, snatching the
bread out of their hungry mouths, whilst himself eating cake. They did
not believe that undermining the great house would disturb its
foundations. That was a mere excuse. How could his lordship be sure that
undermining would crack his walls till he had tried it? And—supposing
they did settle, what of that? They might be rebuilt. The men had been
told that his lordship had painted the north wall with impenetrable,
anti-damp preparation, because on that side of the house the paper in
the rooms became mildewed. If there was damp, what better means of
drying the house than undermining it? Why should his lordship send many
pounds to London for damp-excluding paint, when by spending the money in
Orleigh he might so drain the soil through a level under the foundations
that no moisture could possibly rise?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account