Arminell: A Social Romance, Vol. 1Baring-Gould, S. (Sabine)
General
Arminell: A Social Romance, Vol. 1
Baring-Gould, S. (Sabine)
English fiction -- 19th century
Lord Lamerton had made a great deal of money out of the first mine. He
had provided good cottages for his tenants, the workmen, but so much
worse if they were to be turned out of them.
The mine had been christened Wheal Perseverance, and what does
perseverance mean, but going on with what is begun? If his lordship had
not intended to carry on the mine indefinitely, he should not have
called it Wheal Perseverance. When he gave it that name he as much as
promised to keep it going always, and to stop it now was a breach of
faith. Was it endurable that Lord Lamerton should close the mine? Who
had put the manganese in the rock? Was it Lord Lamerton? What had the
metal been run there for but for the good of mankind, that it might be
extracted and utilized? God had carried the lode under Orleigh Park
before a Lamerton was thought of. Was it justifiable that one man
through his aristocratic selfishness should interfere with the public
good, should contravene the arrangements of the Creator? In the gospel
the man who hid his talent was held up to condemnation, but here was a
nobleman who sat down upon the talent belonging to a score of
hard-working and necessitous men, desirous of extracting it, and refused
to permit them to do what God had commanded. Was there not a fable about
a dog in the manger? Was not his lordship a very dog in a manger,
neither using the manganese himself, nor allowing those who desired to
dig it out to put a pick into the ground and disturb it? Maybe there was
a “bunch” under the state drawing-room large enough to support a score
of families for three years, the men in meat and broadcloth, the women
in velvets and jockey-club essence. Lord Lamerton and Lady Lamerton
begrudged them these necessaries of life. The laws of the land, no
doubt, were on the side of the nobleman, but the law of God on that of
the labourer. The laws were imposed on the people by a House of Lords
and the Queen, and therefore they would agitate for the abolition of an
hereditary aristocracy and keep their hats on when next the National
Anthem was played.
There were more mixed up in the matter than his lordship. Lord Lamerton
did nothing without consulting the agent, Mr. Macduff. The abandonment
of the mine was Macduff’s doing. The reason was known to every
one—Macduff was under the control of his wife. Mrs. Macduff was offended
because the school children did not curtsey and touch their caps when
she drove through the village in her victoria.
The rector also had a finger in this particular pie. He bore a spite
against Captain Saltren, because the captain was not a church-man. Not a
word had been said about stopping the lime-quarry. Oh no! of course not,
for Captain Tubb taught in the Sunday-school. If Stephen Saltren had
taken a class, nothing would have been said about discontinuing the
mine. Therefore the miners resolved to join the Liberation Society and
make an outcry for the disestablishment of the Church.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account