Armor and Arms: An elementary handbook and guide to the collection in the City Art Museum of St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A. — John Shaqi
Armor and Arms: An elementary handbook and guide to the collection in the City Art Museum of St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.Hoopes, Thomas T.
History
Armor and Arms: An elementary handbook and guide to the collection in the City Art Museum of St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.
Hoopes, Thomas T.
Armor -- Catalogs; Weapons -- Catalogs
But of all the specimens of antique armor and arms in this (and possibly
in any other) museum, none surpasses the helmet shown in our
frontispiece. This helmet, together with fragments of armor, a shield
rim and a spear point, all now in the Museum, was found in a tomb near
Metaponto, in Southern Italy, where once there was a Greek colony. It is
believed to date from about the middle of the sixth century B.C. The
helmet is of bronze, the upper part of the bowl formed as the neck and
head of a ram. This is surmounted by a great crest of silver, resting on
a support of ivory. The cheek pieces of the helmet have rams’ heads in
profile embossed in relief. The eyes, the horns of the main ram’s head,
the ivory crest holder and part of the silver crest are restorations,
but enough original fragments of the crest were found with the helmet to
indicate exactly how the crest was shaped. Moreover the existence of
such metallic crests is verified by a bronze statuette of similar origin
(Fig. 6).
[Illustration: _Fig. 4. A crossbow lock two thousand years old, with
a model to show how the parts interlock. An ingenious bit of early
mechanical engineering._]
At first glance, the helmet proclaims itself a great work of sculpture,
and proves that arms and armor can properly belong in a museum of art.
How very well this piece deserves its place here is still more apparent
on close examination. It seems incredible that so long ago a craftsman
could, without any of our modern tools, have formed from a single plate
of bronze such a deep and difficult forging as this helmet bowl. It is
equally amazing that, in a period still considered as archaic, his
artistic imagination could have produced so naturalistic yet so noble a
rendition of an animal form. The technical skill and taste of the
engraving and embossing are also noteworthy: the suggestion of locks of
hair around the forehead, the eyebrows which terminate as snakes’ heads,
the suggestions of skin texture on the rams’ heads. It is indeed one of
the world’s masterpieces of armor.
Although the Greeks made their armor out of bronze, they did have
knowledge of iron, at least as early as the fifth century B.C. But it
was extremely difficult for them to prepare, as they had not yet
discovered efficient methods of smelting it from iron ore, so that what
little they had was very precious. It could not be spared for making
armor, but was restricted to edged weapons where a relatively small
amount of this hard new metal could be most effective. The Romans too
used iron, and as their technical skill improved they used more and more
of it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account