Astronomy and General Physics Considered with Reference to Natural TheologyWhewell, William
Religion
Astronomy and General Physics Considered with Reference to Natural Theology
Whewell, William
Astronomy; Cosmic physics; Natural theology
Now a question naturally occurs, is the equilibrium of our present
ocean of this unstable kind, or is it stable? The sea, after its
most violent agitations, appears to return to its former state of
repose; but may not some extraordinary cause produce in it some
derangement which may go on increasing till the waters all rush one
way, and thus drown the highest mountains? And if we are safe from
this danger, what are the conditions by which we are so secured?
The illustration which we have employed obviously suggests the
answer to this question; namely, that the equilibrium is unstable,
so long as the solid parts are of such a kind as to float in the
fluid parts; and of course we should expect that the equilibrium
will be stable whenever the contrary is the case, that is, when
the solid parts of the earth are of greater specific gravity than
the sea. A more systematic mathematical calculation has conducted
Laplace to a demonstration of this result.
The mean specific gravity of the earth appears to be about _five_
times that of water, so that the condition of the stability of the
ocean is abundantly fulfilled. And the provision by which this
stability is secured was put in force through the action of those
causes, whatever they were, which made the density of the solid
materials and central parts of the earth greater than the density
of the incumbent fluid.
When we consider, however, the manner in which the wisdom of the
Creator, even in those cases in which his care is most apparent,
as in the structure of animals, works by means of intermediate
causes and general laws, we shall not be ready to reject all belief
of an end in such a case as this, merely because the means are
mechanical agencies. Laplace says, “in virtue of gravity, the most
dense of the strata of the earth are those nearest to the centre;
and thus the mean density exceeds that of the waters which cover
it; which suffices to secure the stability of the equilibrium of
the seas, and to put a bridle upon the fury of the waves.” This
statement, if exact, would not prove that He who subjected the
materials of the earth to the action of gravity did not _intend_
to restrain the rage of the waters: but the statement is not true
in fact. The lower strata, so far as man has yet examined, are
very far from being constantly, or even generally, heavier than
the superincumbent ones. And certainly solidification by no means
implies a greater density than fluidity: the density of Jupiter
is one fourth, that of Saturn less than one seventh, of that of
the earth. If an ocean of water were poured into the cavities upon
the surface of Saturn, its equilibrium would _not_ be stable. It
would leave its bed on one side of the globe; and the planet would
finally be composed of one hemisphere of water and one of land.
If the Earth had an ocean of a fluid six times as heavy as water,
(quicksilver is thirteen times as heavy,) we should have, in like
manner, a dry and a fluid hemisphere.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account