+--------------------+-------+------+---------+----------+ | | | | Total | £1 | | Paper. | Lost. | Won. | Winning | Fixed | | | | | Odds. | Stake. | +--------------------+-------+------+---------+----------+ | Daily Express | 670 | 299 | 678·93 | Won £8 | | Jockey | 696 | 243 | 687·86 | Lost 9 | | Racehorse | 566 | 240 | 555·52 | ” 11 | | Chilton’s Guide | 357 | 132 | 341·16 | ” 16 | | Morning Leader | 690 | 309 | 667·93 | ” 22 | | Gale’s | 639 | 231 | 501·85 | ” 37 | | Sportsman | 738 | 285 | 679·02 | ” 59 | | Daily Mail | 642 | 278 | 574·19 | ” 68 | | Racing World | 696 | 275 | 626·19 | ” 70 | | Standard | 872 | 313 | 781·22 | ” 91 | | Star | 750 | 317 | 635·36 | ” 114 | | Sporting Chronicle | 785 | 299 | 669·68 | ” 115 | | Diamond Special | 482 | 169 | 365·83 | ” 116 | | Daily Sport | 895 | 293 | 768·20 | ” 127 | | Advertiser | 724 | 259 | 589·36 | ” 135 | | Sporting World | 886 | 303 | 747·44 | ” 139 | | Sporting Life | 1327 | 411 | 1179·25 | ” 147 | | Telegraph | 928 | 345 | 724·67 | ” 203 | +--------------------+-------+------+---------+----------+ The following are taken from a day’s selections—January 7, 1905—and show how the tips for hurdle-racing are even more unreliable than those for flat-racing:— GATWICK MEETING (Six Races). London Star { 6 selections (Capt. Coe’s Specials) { —all wrong. Middleham Opinion { 3 selections (one “best thing”) (Mentor) { —all wrong. The Jockey { 5 selections (one “special”) { —all wrong. Racehorse (Admiral) { 1 selection (“one horse nap”) { —wrong. Early Bird’s Finals { 6 selections (one “good,” one “selected”) { —all wrong. Sun Dawn’s Finals { 6 selections (one “good”) { —1 right (_not_ the “good”). Form’s Finals { 6 selections { —2 right. Presto’s Double { Double selection for two races { —wrong. Sunday Chronicl. { 4 selections (Galliard) { —all wrong. Sunrise’s Finals { 6 selections { —all wrong. Victor’s Finals { 6 selections (one “nap,” one “good”) { —1 right (neither “nap” nor “good”).
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account