Bismarck : $b some secret pages of his history (Vol. 1 of 3). Being a diary kept by Dr. Moritz Busch during twenty-five years' official and private intercourse with the great ChancellorBusch, Moritz
History
Bismarck : $b some secret pages of his history (Vol. 1 of 3). Being a diary kept by Dr. Moritz Busch during twenty-five years' official and private intercourse with the great Chancellor
Busch, Moritz
Bismarck, Otto, Fürst von, 1815-1898
_March 1st._--Count Bismarck wishes me to get the following inserted in
the South German newspapers:--“The speech of von Freydorf, the Grand
Ducal Minister, in the Baden Diet on the Jurisdiction Treaty with the
North German Confederation, has been inspired by an absolutely correct
view of the situation. Particular attention should be paid to that
portion in which the Foreign Minister of the Grand Duchy declared the
policy of Baden to be in perfect accord with that of the Chancellor
of the North German Confederation, and also to the manner in which he
defined the position of the South German States towards the Treaty of
Prague. Through the dissolution of the old Germanic Confederacy, those
States have, as a matter of fact, become sovereign States. That treaty
_gives them liberty_ (to me: Underline those words!) to form a new
union amongst themselves, a South German Confederation, by means of
which they may take measures for bringing about a national union with
the united North. That treaty involves no prescription, engagement or
compulsion whatever to adopt such a course. Any insinuation of that
kind with respect to States whose sovereignty has been emphatically
recognised would be something absolutely unheard of. In the Swiss war
of the Sonderbund, and also in the late American civil war, States
were obliged against their own will to remain within a union which
they had previously joined, but no one ever saw a sovereign State or
Prince required to enter into confederation against their own judgment.
The South German States, including half of Hesse, have unquestionably
the right--acting either in concert or singly--to endeavour, in
co-operation with the North, to advance the cause of national unity.
The question is whether the present is a good time to choose. The
Chancellor of the North German Confederation answers this question
in the negative. But it is only possible by the most wilful garbling
of his expressions to maintain that his final aim is not the union of
Germany. Partition of German national territory! Calumny! Not a single
word of the Chancellor’s justifies that conclusion. As Herr Lasker
has not spoken at the instance of the Government of Baden, although
his speech would almost convey the impression that he was a Minister
of that State, it is difficult to understand where he got that idea.
Perhaps it was merely the conceit of the honourable member that led him
to make such a statement.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account