Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 67, No. 415, May, 1850Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 67, No. 415, May, 1850
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
This, being the deliberate opinion of a British statesman of high
character, not supposed to be infatuated by a blind love of
revolutionary doctrines, demands serious examination. Let us see,
therefore, what are the principles which received the sanction of the
British Government on this occasion. In our opinion, they are precisely
those principles that lead with certainty to political anarchy and
national demoralisation. This vaunted constitution revived no local
habits of business, re-established no parochial usages, improved no
provincial institutions, corrected no political immoralities, restored
no religious authority, and insured no education to the clergy. It
proclaimed universal suffrage to an armed people, and vote by ballot to
a mob that cannot write; and these are the principles held up to public
approbation for their _general soundness_! While, as to the proofs of
admirable temper and self-command displayed by this assembly, these
feelings were surely not expressed in the decree by which this
good-tempered assembly excluded all their countrymen, who had immigrated
to the Greek territory since the year 1828, from official employments.
There are, perhaps, some who may feel inclined to observe to us, as Rob
Roy did to his kinsman, Bailie Nicol Jarvie, when they met in the
Tolbooth of Glasgow, “Hout, tout! man, let that flee stick in the wa’;
when the dirt’s dry it will rub out.” Be it so; but there are political
blunders that leave a stain, which neither time nor repentance can
efface.
We believe that the source of Lord Aberdeen’s error arose from his wish
to treat Greece as an independent state. But Greece under the protection
of the three powers, and loaded with debt, could not be an independent
power. False appearances always produce evil consequences. Lord
Palmerston had been in too great a hurry to make the bantling monarchy
of the treaty of 1832 walk without a baby-jumper, and his rivalry with
Warwick the king-maker was not more glorious than his emulation of Mr
Winkle. He ought to have perceived that sundry Klephtopiratic
excrescences, like the protuberances on the body of a young bear,
required to be carefully licked into shape. Our Foreign Secretary
delayed the operation too long; and, when he perceived the dangers that
had resulted from his negligence, he erroneously fancied that a licking
of a different kind, applied by Admiral Parker to King Otho’s
Government, would set all right.
When the Greek monarchy was founded in 1832, it was the duty of Lord
Palmerston to have laid before Parliament detailed answers to the
following questions, as a justification of the course he had pursued in
engaging Great Britain to protect the new state, and furnish it with a
loan of £2,400,000. The questions, in perfect ignorance of which the
character of England was compromised, and the money wasted, were:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account