No metaphysician has ever, that I have read, expounded belief. Has
Hartley? This quasi-belief, or half-belief, against better knowledge,
must be admitted as a sure fact or phenomenon. I don’t care how hard
it may be to persuade anybody to believe as the foundation of a
philosophy an absurdity, or self-contradictory proposition, “That you
believe to be true, that which you know to be false.” There the fact
is; and without it you build your house in the air—off the ground.
Soften it—explain it. Say that you know for one moment, and in the
next know the contrary. Say that you _lean to belief_—that it is an
impression, half-formed—imperfect belief—a state of mind that has
partaken of the nature of belief—that it is an impression resembling
belief—operating partial effects of belief. But unquestionably, no
man, woman, or child has read a romance of Scott or Bulwer or Dickens,
without seeing their actions and sufferings with his soul, in a way
that, if his soul be honest, and can simply tell its own suffering,
must by it be described as a sort of momentary belief. What are the
grief, the tears, the joy, the hope, the fear, the love, the
admiration, and half-worship—the vexation, the hate, the indignation,
the scorn, the gratitude, yea, and the thirst of revenge—if the
pageant floats by, and stirs actually to belief? The supposition is an
impossibility, and the theory lies on our side, and not on Johnson’s,
who has nothing for him but a whim of rationalism. I take
novels—because in them it is a common proof, though this species be
the less noble. But take Epos from the beginning. Take Tragedy—take
Comedy—and what is, was, or will it be, but a half-unsubstantial image
of reality, waited upon by a half-substantial image of belief, the
fainter echo of airy harps? My drift is, that our entire affection,
passion—choose your word—attended with pleasure and pain of heart and
imagination—the love, the hate in either, are the sustaining,
actuating soul of the belief. Evidence, that as the passion thrills,
the belief waxes, and that—
SEWARD.
Clear as mud.
TALBOYS.
As amber.
NORTH.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account