Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 75, No. 462, April 1854Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 75, No. 462, April 1854
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
ships requiring large growth; and, with our modern method of splicing
yards and masts, we can do perfectly well with the less tall timber of
Norway and Sweden.
The real fact is, that the alleged short supply of the raw materials to
be expected from Russia is a perfect bugbear. We could dispense with
Russia as a country of supply, were we to employ British capital to
assist our own colonists, and other countries, to provide us with such
supply. There was once, however, a Russian Company; and the trade seems
to have been conducted as a monopoly ever since.
But we must get rid of this strange argument, that the value of the
trade with a country consists in the large amount of indebtedness which
we contract with its dealers. We have now to consider the relative value
of Russia and Turkey as _consumers_ of British manufactured goods and
produce. The following we find to have been the value of British and
Irish produce and manufactures exported to the two countries for the
five years from 1846 to 1850:—
1846. 1847. 1848. 1849. 1850.
Turkey, £2,141,897 £2,992,280 £3,116,365 £2,930,612 £3,113,679
Russia, 1,725,148 1,844,543 1,925,226 1,566,575 1,454,771
Turkey thus took from us in 1850 £1,658,908 in excess of Russia’s
purchases, having increased that excess from £416,719 in 1846. The
increased imports of the former country amounted in the five years to
nearly a million sterling, or 50 per cent, whilst the imports of Russia
fell off by £370,377, or above 20 per cent. There is this great
difference, too, in the imports from this country of Russia and
Turkey—The former takes from us raw materials, which we do not produce
ourselves, deriving merely a mercantile or brokerage profit upon the
supply; manufactured articles which contain the smallest amount of
British labour; and machinery to aid the progress of her population as
our rivals in manufacturing pursuits. The latter takes our fully
manufactured and perfected fabrics. So far as our cotton and woollen
manufacturers are concerned, Russia took in 1850—
Cotton yarn, £245,625
Woollen and worsted do., 304,016
Machinery and mill-work, 203,992
The remainder of her imports from us consisted of foreign produce.
Turkey took from us, however, a large amount of labour and skill, or its
reward, as will be seen from the following table:—
_Imports of Manufactured Textiles to Russia and Turkey in 1850._
Cotton. Woollen. Linen. Silk. Total.
Turkey, £2,232,369 £154,558 £22,500 £13,221 £2,422,348
Russia, 61,196 66,256 5,414 8,579 140,455
——————————
Total excess to Turkey, £2,280,903
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account