Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 75, No. 462, April 1854Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 75, No. 462, April 1854
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
In answer to these communications, Lord John Russell, on the 9th
February, forwarded a despatch, of the wisdom of which it is for the
public to form their own opinion. It commences with an acknowledgment of
“the moderation, the frankness, and the friendly disposition of his
Imperial Majesty.” Why the first of these terms should have been
employed, we really do not comprehend. Then Lord John, adverting to the
indirect proposal of the Emperor, observes that—“In considering this
grave question, the first reflection which occurs to Her Majesty’s
Government is, that no actual crisis has occurred which renders
necessary a solution of this vast European problem”—that “there is no
sufficient cause for intimating to the Sultan that he cannot keep peace
at home, or preserve friendly relations with his neighbours”—and that
“it occurs further to her Majesty’s Government to remark that the event
which is contemplated is not definitely fixed in point of time.” After
pointing out the impropriety as well as the impolicy of devising a
partition for providing for a settlement under such circumstances, Lord
John intimates, in tolerably distinct terms, that “neither England nor
France, nor probably Austria, would be content to see Constantinople
permanently in the hands of Russia.” He then draws the following
conclusions:—
“Upon the whole, then, Her Majesty’s Government are persuaded that no
course of policy can be adopted more wise, more disinterested, more
beneficial to Europe, than that which His Imperial Majesty has so long
followed, and which will render his name more illustrious than that of
the most famous sovereigns who have sought immortality by unprovoked
conquest and ephemeral glory.
“With a view to the success of this policy, it is desirable that the
utmost forbearance should be manifested towards Turkey; that any
demands which the Great Powers of Europe may have to make should be
made matter of friendly negotiation rather than of peremptory demand;
that military and naval demonstrations to coerce the Sultan should as
much as possible be avoided; that differences with respect to matters
affecting Turkey, within the competence of the Sublime Porte, should
be decided after mutual concert between the great powers, and not be
forced upon the weakness of the Turkish Government.”
To this succeeds a passage which we cannot help considering as
unfortunate, because it gives decided colour to the Russian pretext,
that a protectorate over Turkey was necessary for securing the rights of
the Christian inhabitants. There was no occasion whatever for its
introduction, especially as the Emperor had not thought it necessary to
ask advice upon the subject:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account