Let us now, would say our Essayist, proceed on our negative tour, so to
speak, and hasten to pay our respects to the Moon, our nearest
neighbour, and whose distance from the Sun is admitted to adapt her, so
far, for habitation.[72] If it appear, by strong evidence, that the Moon
is not inhabited, then there is an end of the general principle, that
_all_ the bodies of the solar system are inhabited, and that we must
begin our speculation about each with this assumption. If the Moon be
not inhabited, then, it would seem, the belief that each special body in
the system _is_ inhabited, must depend upon reasons specially belonging
to that body, and cannot be taken for granted without these reasons.[73]
Now, as to the Moon, we have latterly acquired the means of making such
exact and minute inquiries, that at the meeting of the British
Association at Hull last year, Mr Phillips, an eminent geologist, stated
that astronomers can discern the shape of a spot on the Moon’s surface,
only a few hundred feet in breadth. Passing by, however, the Essayist’s
brief but able account of the physical condition of this satellite of
ours, we will cite the recent testimony of one accredited by Sir David
Brewster[74] as “a mathematician and a natural philosopher, who has
studied, more than any preceding writer, the analogies between the Earth
and the other planets”—Dr Lardner, who, in the third volume (published
since our last Number appeared) of the work placed at the head of this
article, thus concludes his elaborate account of the Moon, as now
regarded by the most enlightened astronomers—after proving it to be “as
exempt from an atmosphere as is the utterly exhausted receiver of a good
air-pump!”
“In fine, the entire geographical character of the moon, thus
ascertained by long-continued and exact telescopic surveys, leads to
the conclusion, that no analogy exists between it and the earth which
could confer any probability on the conjecture that it fulfils the
same purposes in the economy of the universe; and we must infer, that
whatever be its uses in the solar system, or in the general purposes
of creation, it is not a world inhabited by organised races such as
those to which the earth is appropriated.”[75]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account