When it was discovered that the old planets in certain important
particulars resembled the earth, being opaque and solid bodies, having
similar motions round the sun and on their own axis, some accompanied by
satellites, and all having arrangements producing day and night, summer
and winter, who could help wondering whether they must not also have
inhabitants, reckoning and regulating their lives and employments by
days, months, and years? This was, at most, however, a mere guess or
conjecture; and whether it is now more probable than then, depends on
the intervening progress of astronomy and science in general. Have
subsequent discoveries strengthened or impugned the validity of the
conjecture? The limits of our system have been since vastly extended by
the discovery of Uranus and Neptune; and the planetary sisterhood has
also increased in number by thirty little and very eccentric ones.
Now, as to NEPTUNE, says the Essayist, in substance, what reason has a
sensible person for believing it peopled, as the earth is, by human
beings—_i. e._ consisting of body and soul? He is thirty times further
than we are from the sun, which will appear to it a mere star—about the
size of Jupiter to us; and Neptune’s light and heat will be nine hundred
times less than ours![83] _If_ it, nevertheless, contain animal and
intellectual life, we must try to conceive how they get on with such a
_modicum_ of those useful elements!
But have we general grounds for assuming _all_ the planetary bodies
inhabited? Beginning with the moon, we have encountered a decided
negative. If any planet, however, have sufficient light, heat, clouds,
winds, and a due adjustment of gravity, and the strength of the
materials of which organisation consist, there _may_ be life of some
sort or other. Now we can measure and weigh the planets, exactly, by the
law of gravitation, which embraces every particle of matter in our
system, and find the mass of our earth to be only five times heavier
than water. Comparing it with JUPITER—the bulk of which is 1331 times
greater than that of the Earth—his density is, as a whole, only a
quarter of that of the Earth—not greater than it would be as a sphere of
water; and he is _conjectured_ to be such, and the existence of his
belts to be lines of clouds, fed with vapours raised by the sun’s action
on such a watery sphere—the lines of such clouds being of so steady and
determined a character, in consequence of his great rotatory velocity.
Equal bulk for equal bulk, he is lighter than the Earth, but of course
much heavier altogether; and as he is five times the Earth’s distance
from the Sun, he must get a proportionally smaller amount of light and
heat, and even that diminished by the clouds enveloping him to so great
an extent. What a low degree of vitality, and what kind of organisation
must animal existence possess, to suit such physical conditions,
especially with reference to gravity, which, at his surface, is nearly
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account