Such profligacy was the rule rather than the exception amongst the
Christian Union. At a recent meeting of the Royal Geographical Society,
Mr Lay related another instance of moral turpitude. It appears that the
Union was supposed to consist of men from various provinces of China,
and a number of Bibles adapted for circulation in their respective
districts were regularly issued to these natives, when they were
despatched upon their tours of duty. As there was reason to suppose that
these Bibles were often returned to the office, and had to be paid for
as new ones supplied from the Chinese publisher at Hong-Kong, a number
of them were secretly marked with the names of the converts who were
supposed to distribute them gratis in remote parts of the empire. Before
many days, every one of these marked Bibles returned to the hands of Mr
Hamberg, and it was then discovered that they had been sold to the
Chinese publisher, who had again presented them as new Bibles. Of course
this system of pillage was put a stop to, but we leave the reader to
guess how many more frauds were daily perpetrated by such a set of
scamps upon innocent-minded missionaries. We might fill a volume with
further details of the tricks of the Christian Union, but we forbear.
Amongst these reputed converts to Christianity was one who can at any
rate claim the credit of having so thoroughly deceived us, that even so
recent a writer as Commander Lindesay Brine, of the Royal Navy, did not
succeed in discovering the wolf under the skin of the oily Hung-jin. Mr
Hamberg first met Hung-jin (or, as he now styles himself, Kan-wang) in
1852, at a time when the minds of our residents in China were much
excited. Mr Hamberg was full of curiosity, Hung-jin all ready to gratify
it. Hung-jin quite delighted the missionary “with the interest he
displayed in Christianity, and his acquaintance with its precepts.” The
rogue, be it known, had actually studied Christianity _for two entire
months_, some years previously, under Mr Roberts, an American missionary
in Canton. As a near connection of two out of three of the most
prominent leaders in Kwang-si, Hung-jin could give information about
them; and, still more to delight Mr Hamberg, he invented a fable he knew
would be very palatable to the outer barbarian, and promote the fortune
of himself and family. Hung-jin, having converted us to Taepingism, was
much treasured by our religious societies in China, and every care and
expense were lavished upon him to render him a fit instrument for
keeping up the connection between us and the leaders of the Taeping
movement. He and his brother, we know, were in the employ of two
missionaries in Hong-Kong about the year 1853. Hung-jin was above the
average of his countrymen in ability; and, under the care of the Rev. Mr
Chalmers for three years, made considerable progress in secular studies.
In 1854 he was baptised, and repeated unsuccessful attempts were then
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account