Bildungsromans; Blind -- Fiction; Parent and child -- Fiction; Young men -- Fiction
It had been a dull operation, and they were now in spirits on the
mantelpiece of her room at home in the hospital. When she got back she
was going to put them just where she could see them first thing every
morning, with the toes and the kidney. She had had an awful trouble to
get the eyes.
Oh, so his eyes were gone. Now that was irritating, a personal loss.
Dore had been furious because his appendix had been removed the term
before last, he said it was a blemish on his personal beauty, but eyes
were much more personal. Why hadn’t they taken the eyes of one of the
“muddied oafs”? While he, he was blind. How had it happened? He had
never asked; must have been some accident or something. He would ask.
“Nurse, how did it happen?”
“Do you think you can bear to talk about it?”
“Why not?”
“Well, a small boy threw a stone at the train, and it broke your window
as you were looking out. It was very careless of him. But what I can’t
understand is your being unconscious immediately like that, and not
remembering. But doctor said you could be told, and ...”
A small boy. Damn him.
“And what happened to the small boy?”
“He was whipped by the police yesterday. Won’t you try and get some
sleep now?” and her hands smooth the pillow disinterestedly and tuck
him up. Before, when he remembered it, this had been deliciously
thrilling. So a small boy in a fit of abstraction, or of boredom, had
blinded him, a small boy who could not appreciate what he had done, at
least only for so long as his bottom hurt him. Why, if he had the
child, he would choke him. One’s fingers would go in and in till they
would be enveloped by pink, warm flesh. The little thing would struggle
for a while, and then it would be over, you know, just a tiny momentary
discomfort for an eternity of pleasure, for were not his god-parents
shouldering his sins for him? It would be a kindness to the little
chap, and one would feel so much better for it afterwards. He would be
apprehended for murder, and he would love it. He would make the warder
read the papers to him every morning, he would be sure to have
headlines: BLIND MAN MURDERS CHILD--no, TORTURES CHILD TO DEATH.
And underneath that, if he was lucky, WOMAN JUROR VOMITS, something
really sensational. Mr. Justice Punch, as in all trials of life and
death, would be amazingly witty, and he would be too. He would make
remarks that would earn him some famous title, such as THE AUDACIOUS
SLAUGHTERER. All the children in England would wilt at his name. In the
trial all his old brilliancy would be there. Talking. No more of those
conversations that had been so tremendously important. No more snubs,
no more bitternesses, for the rest of his life he would be surrounded
by dear, good, dull people who would be kind and long-suffering and
good, and who would not really be alive at all. How dull being good for
ever, always being grateful and appreciative for fear of hurting their
feelings. And never to see again, how important transparency was. His
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account