Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. IPutnam, George Haven
History
Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. I
Putnam, George Haven
Books -- History -- 400-1450; Copyright; Freedom of the press -- History -- To 1500; Manuscripts; Printers
Sidonius was born at Lyons, A.D. 430. His father, grandfather, and
great-grandfather had all served as Prætorian Prefects in Gaul, in
which province his own long life was passed. In 472, Sidonius became
Bishop of Arverni, and from that time, as he rather naïvely tells us,
he gave up (as unbecoming ecclesiastical responsibilities) the writing
of compositions “based on pagan models.” In 475, the year before the
last of the western emperors, Augustulus, was driven from Rome by
Odovacar,[4] the Herulian, the Visigoth king, Euric, became master
of Auvergne. Sidonius was at first banished, but in 479 was restored
to his diocese, and continued his work there as bishop and as writer
until his death, ten years later. At the time of the death of Sidonius,
Cassiodorus, who was, during the succeeding eighty years, to have part
in so much of the eventful history of Italy, was ten years old. There
are some points of similarity in the careers of the two men. Both were
of noble family and both began their active work as officials, one of
the Empire, the other of the Gothic kingdom of Italy, while both also
became ecclesiastics. Each saw his country taken possession of by a
foreign invader, and for the purpose of serving his countrymen, (with
which purpose may very possibly have been combined some motives of
personal ambition,) each was able and willing to make himself useful
to the new ruler and thus to retain official position and influence;
and finally, both had literary facility and ambition, and, holding in
regard the works of the great classic writers, endeavoured to model
upon these works the style of their own voluminous compositions.
The political work of Cassiodorus was of course, however, much the
more noteworthy and important, as Sidonius could hardly claim to be
considered a statesman.
In their work as authors, the compositions of Sidonius are, as I judge
from the description, to be ranked higher in literary quality than
those of the later writer, and to have been more successful also in
following the style of classic models. The style of Cassiodorus is
described as both verbose and grandiloquent. In his ecclesiastical,
or rather his monastic work, taken up after half a century of active
political life, it was the fortune of Cassiodorus, as will be described
later, to exercise an influence which continued for centuries, and
which was possibly more far-reaching than was exerted by the career of
any abbot or bishop in the later history of the Church.
The careers of both Sidonius and Cassiodorus have a special interest
because the two men held rather an exceptional position between the
life of the old empire which they survived and that of the new Europe
of the Middle Ages, the beginning of which they lived to see.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account