Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. I — John Shaqi
Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. IPutnam, George Haven
History
Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. I
Putnam, George Haven
Books -- History -- 400-1450; Copyright; Freedom of the press -- History -- To 1500; Manuscripts; Printers
It was the contention of Theodoric that his kingdom represented the
natural continuation of the Roman Empire, and that he was himself
the legitimate successor of the emperors. He took as his official
designation not _Rex Italiæ_, but _Gothorum et Romanorum Rex_. This
contention was fully upheld by the Quæstor, who felt himself to be the
representative at once of the official authority of the new kingdom and
of the literary prestige of the old Empire, and who did what was in
his power to preserve in Ravenna the classical traditions of old Rome
and to make the Court the centre of literary influence and activity.
Theodoric and his Goths had accepted the creed of the Arians, but the
influence of his minister, who was a Christian of the Athanasian or
Trinitarian faith, was sufficient to preserve a spirit of toleration
throughout the kingdom. It is to Cassiodorus that is due what was
probably the first official utterance of toleration that Europe had
known, an utterance that in later European history was to be so largely
set at nought: _Religionem imperare non possumus, quia nemo cogitur
ut credat invitus_.[12] [We must not enforce (acceptance of) a creed,
since no one can think or can believe against his will.] It is not
one of the least of the services of Cassiodorus that he should at
this early date, when the bitterness of controversy was active in
the Church, have been able to set a standard of wise and Christian
toleration. His action had a good effect later in his own monastery
and in the monasteries whose work was modelled on that of Viviers. It
was only in monastic centres like Viviers and Monte Cassino, where
Christian influence and educational work were held to be of more
importance than theological issues, that literary activity became
possible, and it was only in such monasteries that labour was expended
in preserving the writings of “pagan” (that is, of classic) authors.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account