Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. IPutnam, George Haven
History
Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. I
Putnam, George Haven
Books -- History -- 400-1450; Copyright; Freedom of the press -- History -- To 1500; Manuscripts; Printers
The scholarly lovers of fine books in Germany regarded the new art at
the outset with no little disapproval and criticism. The collectors
who had brought together, with much labour and expenditure, stores
of valuable manuscripts dreaded lest, through the multiplication of
comparatively inexpensive copies of their texts, the value of their
collections should be taken away. When the messengers of Cardinal
Bessarion were shown by the Greek Laskaris (later the author of the
first Greek grammar that came into print), a specimen of one of the
earlier printed books, they spoke sneeringly of this so-called
discovery which had been made by a barbarian from a German city.[429]
The great manuscript-dealer, Vespasiano, writing in 1482 concerning
the magnificent ducal library in Urbino, the volumes in which had
been largely either collected or purchased by himself or under his
own direction, says: “In this library all the volumes are of perfect
beauty, all written, by skilled scribes, on parchment and many of
them adorned with exquisite miniatures. The collection contains no
single printed book. The Duke (Frederick) would be ashamed to have a
printed book in his library.”[430] By collectors like Frederick and
manuscript-dealers like Vespasiano, the new art was considered to be
merely a mechanical method of producing inartistic volumes, with which
none but uncultivated people could be satisfied.
For a number of years, therefore, after the work of the first presses,
there were still produced beautiful specimens of manuscripts, more
particularly of Italian and French books of worship, and for this class
of manuscripts the work of the hand illuminators and miniature painters
continued to be utilised. In Germany there are various examples of
books which had been printed, being again produced in written copy, as
for instance, the _Chronicon Urspergense_, of Hroswitha.[431] It was
also the case that for the production of large choir-books the work of
the scribes continued to be useful.
Trithemius, Abbot of Sponheim, wrote to Gerlach, Abbot of Deutz, a
letter which was printed in 1494 in Mayence, under the title, _De Laude
Scriptorum Manualium_. In this he says:
“A work written on parchment could be preserved for a thousand years,
while it is probable that no volume printed on paper will last for more
than two centuries. Many important works have not been printed, and the
copies required of these must be prepared by scribes. The scribe who
ceases his work because of the invention of the printing-press can be
no true lover of books, in that, regarding only the present, he gives
no due thought to the intellectual cultivation of his successors. The
printer has no care for the beauty and the artistic form of books,
while with the scribe this is a labour of love.”[432]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account