Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. IIPutnam, George Haven
History
Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. II
Putnam, George Haven
Books -- History -- 400-1450; Copyright; Freedom of the press -- History -- To 1500; Manuscripts; Printers
“Moschopuli de Ratione Examinandæ Orationis Libellus, Græce.” 4to.
This was a grammatical work for the instruction of youth, now first
printed.
Impressions of “Juvenal, Persius, Valerius Maximus, Lucian, and
Terence.”
A fifth impression of the complete “Biblia Latina,” for the fourth
impression of which sale had evidently been found notwithstanding
the denunciations of the Church authorities. Robert had for five
years been making preparation for this edition by the collection
both of printed texts and of MSS. For the notes, use had been
made of the material of Erasmus, Gualtherus, and particularly of
Vatablus, the learned Professor of Hebrew in the _Collége Royal_.
The citations from the latter had been collected by diligent
students who had attended the Professor’s lectures. The captious
divines, finding the notes sanctioned by such an authority, did
not at first venture to cavil at this edition. Later, however,
they threatened Robert with various pains and penalties because he
had omitted to procure for the work their license. They contended
that the title of “Printer to the King” did not exempt him from
a compliance with the regulations prescribed by the University.
This claim on the part of the University, that the approval of its
own representatives must be secured even for works issued under
the direct authority of the Crown, was throughout the following
century a frequent cause of contention. It appears never to have
been formally adjusted. The charge was made at the time that the
_scholia_ or _annotationes_ complained of were really the work not
of Vatablus, but of Robert himself. Such an accusation does credit
to the publisher’s scholarship if not to his truthfulness, but
there is no evidence to support it.
1546. “Biblia Hebræa,” 16mo, or _forma minima_, issued in eight
volumes. Le Long speaks of the correctness and extreme beauty of
this edition.[11]
A sixth edition of the Latin Bible, with a text more pure and more
accurate than had been secured in any of the previous issues. This
was the second of Robert’s Latin Bibles which escaped censure.
1546. The first and only publication from his press in Italian,
which is ranked as one of the most interesting literary curiosities
bearing his imprint, “La Coltivatione di Luigi Alamanni, al
Christianissimo Re Francesco primo, con privilegi.” 4to. This is
the first edition of what Greswell calls the georgical poem of
Alamanni. The character is a bold italic, and the volume is a
beautiful piece of book-making. The author was a Florentine poet,
banished from his native country, who had found refuge at the Court
of Francis. He is one of the very few contemporary writers who
secured the advantage of Robert’s imprint.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account