British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
In November the English Parliament met, heartened indeed by the naval
victory of La Hogue, but not a little grieved over the failure of
Steenkirk. Again, the financial aspect was extremely discouraging; and
Sir Stephen Fox announced that there was not another day’s subsistence
for the Army in the treasury. The prevailing discontent found vent in
furious denunciations of Count Solmes, and a cry that English soldiers
ought to be commanded by English officers. The debate waxed hot.
The hardest of hard words were used about the Dutch generals, and a
vast deal of nonsense was talked about military matters. There were,
however, a great number of officers in the House of Commons, many of
whom had been present at the action. With much modesty and good sense
they refused to join in the outcry against the Dutch, and contrived so
to compose matters that the House committed itself to no very foolish
resolution. The votes for the Army were passed; and no difficulty was
made over the preparations for the next campaign. Finally, two new
regiments of cavalry were raised—Lord Macclesfield’s Horse, which was
disbanded twenty years later; and Conyngham’s Irish Dragoons, which
still abides with us as the Eighth, King’s Royal Irish, Hussars.
◆1693.◆
Meanwhile the French military system had suffered an irreparable loss
in Louvois’s death, the source of woes unnumbered to France in the
years that were soon to come. Nevertheless, the traditions of his rule
were strong, and the French once more were first in the field, with,
as usual, a vast siege-train massed on the Meuse and on the Scheldt.
But a late spring and incessant rain delayed the opening of the
campaign till the beginning of May, when Luxemburg assembled seventy
thousand men in rear of the Haine by Mons, and Boufflers forty-eight
thousand more on the Scheldt at Tournay. The French king was with the
troops in person; and the original design was, as usual, to carry on
a war of sieges on the Meuse, Boufflers reducing the fortresses while
Luxemburg shielded him with a covering army. Lewis, however, finding
that the towns which he had intended to invest were likely to make an
inconveniently stubborn defence, presently returned home, and after
detaching thirty thousand men to the war in Germany, left Luxemburg to
do as he would. It had been better for William if the Grand Monarch had
remained in Flanders.
The English king, on his side, assembled sixty thousand men at Brussels
as soon as the French began to move, and led them with desperate
haste to the Senne, where he took up an impregnable position at Park.
Luxemburg marched up to a position over against him, and then came
one of those deadlocks which were so common in the old campaigns. The
two armies stood looking at each other for a whole month, neither
venturing to move, neither daring to attack, both ill-supplied,
both discontented, and as a natural consequence both losing scores,
hundreds, and even thousands of men through desertion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account