British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
Such fighting, however, could not continue for long. William, on
observing Luxemburg’s preparations for the final assault, had ordered
nine battalions from his left to reinforce his right. These never
reached their destination. The Marquis of Feuquières, an officer
even more celebrated for his acuteness as a military critic than for
his skill in the field, watched them as they moved, and suddenly led
his cavalry forward to the weakest point of the entrenchment. The
battalions hesitated, halted, and then turned about to meet this new
danger, but too late to save the forcing of the entrenchment. The
battle was now virtually over. Neerwinden was carried, Ramsey after
a superb defence had been driven out of Laer, the Brandenburgers had
perforce retreated with him, the infantry that lined the centre of the
entrenchment had forsaken it, and the French cavalry was pouring in and
cutting down the fugitives by scores. William, who had galloped away
in desperation to the left, now returned at headlong speed with six
regiments of English cavalry,[10] which delivered charge after charge
with splendid gallantry, to cover the retreat of the foot. On the left
Tolmach and Bellasys by great exertion brought off their infantry in
good order, but on the right the confusion was terrible. The rout
was complete, the few bridges were choked by a heaving mass of guns,
waggons, pack-animals, and men, and thousands of fugitives were cut
down, drowned, or trampled to death. William did all that a gallant
man could do to save the day, but in vain. His troops had done heroic
things to redeem his bad generalship; and against any living man but
Marlborough or Luxemburg they would probably have held their own. It
was the general, not the soldiers that failed.
The losses on both sides were very severe. That of the French was about
eight thousand men; that of the Allies about twelve thousand, killed,
wounded, and prisoners, and among the dead was Count Solmes, the hated
Solmes of Steenkirk. The nineteen British battalions present lost
one hundred and thirty-five officers killed, wounded, and taken. The
French captured eighty guns and a vast quantity of colours, but the
Allies, although beaten, could also show fifty-six French flags. And,
indeed, though Luxemburg won, and deserved to win a great victory, yet
the action was not such as to make the allied troops afraid to meet the
French. They had stood up, fifty thousand against eighty thousand, and
if they were beaten they had at any rate dismayed ever Frenchman on the
field but Luxemburg. In another ten years their turn was to come, and
they were to take a part of their revenge on the very ground over which
many of them had fled.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account