British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army" — John Shaqi
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
A glance at any old map of Flanders shows how thickly studded was this
country with walled towns of less or greater strength, and explains why
a war in Flanders should generally have been a war of sieges. Every one
of these little towns, of course, had its garrison; and the manœuvres
of contending forces were governed very greatly by the effort, on one
side, to release these garrisons for active service in the field, and,
on the other, to keep them confined within their walls for as long
as possible. Hence it is obvious that an invading army necessarily
enjoyed a great advantage, since it menaced the fortresses of the enemy
while its own were unthreatened. Thus ten thousand men on the Upper
Lys could paralyse thrice their number in Ghent and Bruges and the
adjacent towns. On the other hand, if an invading general contemplated
the siege of an important town, he manœuvred to entice the garrison
into the field before he laid siege in form. Still, once set down to a
great siege, an army was stationary, and the bare fact was sufficient
to liberate hostile garrisons all over the country; and hence arose the
necessity of a second army to cover the besieging force. The skill and
subtlety manifested by great generals to compass these different ends
is unfortunately only to be apprehended by closer study than can be
expected of any but the military student.
A second cause contributed not a little to increase the taste for a
war of sieges, namely, the example of France, then the first military
nation in Europe.[2] The Court of Versailles was particularly fond of
a siege, since it could attend the ceremony in state and take nominal
charge of the operations with much glory and little discomfort or
danger. The French passion for rule and formula also found a happy
outlet in the conduct of a siege, for, while there is no nation more
brilliant or more original, particularly in military affairs, there is
also none that is more conceited or pedantic. The craving for sieges
among the French was so great that the King took pains, by the grant of
extra pay and rations, to render this species of warfare popular with
his soldiers.[3]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account