British freewomen : $b Their historical privilegeStopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
History
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege
Stopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
Women -- Great Britain; Women -- History
It is strange that this unique exception should have occurred in this
barony, which had come through a woman, and had been held by a woman.
Yvo de Vesci came over with William the Conqueror, and married Alda
Tyson, daughter and heir of the Lord of Alnwick. Their daughter
Beatrix was sole heir, and married Eustace of Knaresborough, their son
taking his mother’s name of De Vesci.
Footnote 4:
_See_ also “Statutes,” vol. ii., p. 321. Noble ladies shall be tried
as peers of the realm are tried, when they are indicted of treason or
felony, 20 Henry VI.
The opinions of Peeresses as representing property, were always
considered in the councils of the King. In the early Norman days they
sat among “The Magnates Regni” in right of their fees and communities.
“In the Constitutions of Clarendon, Henry II., we find that ‘Universe
Persona Regni, qui de Rege tenent in Capite’ were to attend the King’s
Court and Council.” (Report of the Lord’s Committee on the Dignity of a
Peer of the Realm.) The Abbesses, especially those of Shaftesbury,
Barking, Wilton and St. Mary of Winchester, holding directly of the
King, were summoned to Anglo-Norman Parliaments, as they had been
summoned to Anglo-Saxon Witenagemots. Selden mentions their Summons of 5
Edward I. as being extant in his time; their Summons, twenty-nine years
later, to the Parliament of 34 Edward I. is still extant, written in the
same manner and terms as those of the other clergy. (Palgrave’s
“Parliamentary Writs”; 34 Edward I.)
Other Peeresses were summoned according to their inheritance, which, we
have seen, followed different lines from what it does to-day, or =by
proxy=. By an exemption, intended as a privilege in these days of rough
travelling and dangers, a peeress was permitted “to chuse and name her
lawful proxy to appear for her _ad colloquimn et tractatium coram rege_
on her behalf.”
Alicia de Bigod sent her two proxies to Parliament, 35 Edward I. (_See_
Rot. Parl., 189.) Selden and Gurden mention “_nine_ peeresses so
summoned to the Parliament of 35 Edward III.” There were in reality ten.
But there was not a _Parliament proper_ that year, no writs having been
issued for the Commons. It was rather a council of Peers and Peeresses,
especially of those holding lands in Ireland, who were summoned to
consult with the King what should be done in that country, and what aid
they would grant the King. “Anno 35 Edward III., null summoniciones but
summons to council 11 Comitissæ summonitæ at mittend. sede dagnos ad.
colloq.” (Harl. MS., 6204).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account