British freewomen : $b Their historical privilegeStopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
History
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege
Stopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
Women -- Great Britain; Women -- History
THOUGH early British traditions may survive in later Literature, we
cannot accept them for critical purposes. The century of the birth of
Christ is the earliest date of our authentic history. The words of the
Romans, strangers and enemies, are unexceptionable witnesses. Nothing
impressed the Romans more than the equality of the sexes among the
Northern nations; the man’s reverence for womanhood, the woman’s
sympathy with manhood, and the high code of morality that was the
natural outcome of this well-balanced society.
Plutarch (“de Virtut Mul.”) says, “Concerning the virtues of women, I am
not of the same mind with Thucydides. For he would prove that she is the
best woman concerning whom there is least discourse made by people
abroad, either to her praise or dispraise; judging that as the person,
so the very name of a good woman ought to be retired and not to gad
abroad.... And seeing that many worthy things, both public and private,
have been done by women, it is not amiss to give a brief historical
account of those that are public in the first place.” Among the examples
he cites, there is that of the continental Celts, kindred to the
British. Some of these wandered north-west, and some due south. “There
arose a very grievous and irreconcilable contention among the Celts
before they passed over the Alps to inhabit that tract of Italy which
now they inhabit, which proceeded to a civil war. The women, placing
themselves between the armies, took up the controversies, argued them so
accurately, and determined them so impartially that an admirable
friendly correspondence and general amity ensued, both civil and
domestic. Hence the Celts made it their practice to take women into
consultation about peace or war, and to use them as mediates in any
controversies that arose between them and their allies. In the league,
therefore, made with Hannibal, the writing runs thus—If the Celts take
occasion of quarrelling with the Carthaginians, the governors and
generals of the Carthaginians in Spain shall decide the dispute; but if
the Carthaginians accuse the Celts, the Celtic women shall decide the
controversy.” The Romans were much struck by the similar position of
women among the Britons, Belgic and Celtic alike. Elton, on the
authority of Ammianus Marcellinus, says of the women, “that their
approximation to the men in stature was the best evidence that the
nation had advanced out of barbarism.” Cæsar tells us (“Eng.” 117) that
the British women were made use of in Court, in Council, and in Camp,
and that no distinction of sex was made in places of command or
government. Selden, in his chapter on “Women” in the “Janus Anglorum,”
reminds us, that “Boadicea so successfully commanded the British armies
as to beat and conquer the Roman Viceroy, and no doubt that noble lady
was a deliberative member of the Council where the resolution was taken
to fight, and that she should command the forces.” Tacitus (“Vita
Agric.,” c.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account