British freewomen : $b Their historical privilegeStopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
History
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege
Stopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
Women -- Great Britain; Women -- History
xv.) says, “Under the leadership of Boadicea, a woman of
kingly descent (for they admit of no distinction of sex in their royal
successions), they all rose to arms. Had not Paulinus, on hearing of
this outbreak, rendered prompt succour, Britain would have been lost.”
He owns elsewhere that had the Britons but been able to unite among
themselves, the Romans could not have conquered them; and he more than
once notes the bravery of the women in stimulating the warriors.
More fully in his “Annals” (B. xiv.), Tacitus describes how Suetonius
Paulinus attacked Mona (Anglesea) the stronghold of the Druids; and how
the women priestesses dashed about clothed in black, like furies, with
dishevelled hair, and with torches in their hands, encouraging and
threatening the soldiers, and when all was lost, perishing bravely among
the flames kindled by the conqueror. This is told, not in the tones with
which one belauds compatriot heroines, but in those of an enemy, to whom
these women added new terrors and increased troubles. Meanwhile, in the
East, the Roman statue of Victory had fallen from its place in the
temple of Claudius at Camalodunum; evil signs and omens weakened the
hearts of the Roman soldiers, and frantic Priestesses encouraged the
hopes of the British force thereby. Boadicea, having succeeded in
uniting some of the neighbouring tribes, had driven Catus over the sea,
had subdued Petelius Cerialus, had destroyed the Colonia at Camalodunum,
had sacked Verulam, and marched on London, building an intrenched camp
near what we now call Islington. Suetonius Paulinus, fresh from the
slaughter of the sacred Druid host, advanced to meet her. Tacitus
describes the position of the armies, and reports her speech. Not being
“unaccustomed to address the public,” she called her army to witness
“that it was usual for the Britons to war under the conduct of women,
but on that occasion she entered the field, not as one descended from
ancestors so illustrious to recover her kingdom and her treasure, but as
one of the humblest among them, to take vengeance for liberty
extinguished, her own body lacerated with stripes, and the chastity of
her daughters defiled.... They would see that in that battle they must
conquer or perish. Such was the fixed resolve of a woman; the men might
live if they pleased and be the slaves of the Romans.” “Neither was
Suetonius silent at so perilous a juncture, for though he confided in
the bravery of his men, yet he mingled exhortations with entreaties. ‘In
that great host were to be seen more women than efficient men.
Unwarlike, unarmed, they would give way the instant they felt the sword
and valour of those victorious troops, etc.’” Then follows the account
of the battle. “The soldiers spared not even the lives of the women, nay
the very beasts, pierced with darts, seemed to swell the heaps of the
slain. The glory gained that day was signal indeed, and equal to the
victories of ancient times, for there are authors who record that of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account