Burmah and the BurmeseMackenzie, Kenneth R. H. (Kenneth Robert Henderson)
History
Burmah and the Burmese
Mackenzie, Kenneth R. H. (Kenneth Robert Henderson)
Burma -- Civilization; Burma -- History
The other manuscripts are not so fine as those I have mentioned, and
present similar characteristics to the inferior sort that I have
described above. It is much to be regretted that we have scarcely an
Orientalist in England who can unfold to us the meaning of these MSS.
Never, in any institution, was a richer bait held out to the scholar
than at the Museum at the present time, and yet there are but one or two
gentlemen capable of instructing us upon this interesting and important
point. The Museum authorities themselves regret, with the rest of
scholardom, that so large a portion of their Oriental collection is still
a dead letter to them. If the present war be productive of no better
result, let us hope that it will cause some one able to translate and
comment on these MSS. to turn his attention to this subject, and give his
researches to an expectant world.[135]
It may not be uninteresting to append a portion of a list, kindly placed
at my disposal by Sir Frederick Madden, of some of the ascertained
Burmese Buddhistic MSS., among the Additional MSS. in the British Museum.
No. 18,753: A Burmese MS. containing the Sut Sîlakkham, a part of the
second division, or Sutrapituka, of the Buddhistic Scriptures, translated
from the Pali. No. 15,240. Burmese translation of a portion of the
Kammavâcâ, or Kammavâchâ. This was presented by the earl of Enniskillen
on the 10th July, 1844, and is written in dark brown letters, on an ivory
plate about fifteen inches in length. No. 17,945: The Tîkâ Kavisâra
Nissaza, a Burmese translation of a Pali commentary on a Buddhistic work
called Kavi-Sara, or the Essence of the Poets. No. 17,700: Part of a
Burmese translation of a Buddhistic legend. This MS. is bound in wood,
profusely gilt. No. 17,699: A religious treatise in Burmese, on the
different sorts of punishment in this life.
“The original,” observes Buchanan,[136] “of most of the Burma books on
law and religion is in the Pali, or Pale language, which, undoubtedly,
is radically the same with the Sanscrit. I was assured at Amarapura that
the Pali of Siam and Pegu differed considerably from that of the Burmas;
and an intelligent native of Tavay, who had been at Cingala, or Candy,
the present capital of Ceylon, and at the ruins of Anuradapura, the
former capital, assured me that the Pali of that island was considerably
different from that of Ava.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account