Hebrew literature -- History and criticism; Jewish literature -- History and criticism; Jews in literature
Not every one named Solomon was Ibn Gebirol. The medieval poets often
signed their verses by an acrostic. Now, when a poem has the signature
of a particular name, the natural tendency has been to ascribe it to
the most famous bearer of the name. Of all the poetical Solomons, Ibn
Gebirol was, beyond question, the greatest. Zunz was the first who
clearly discriminated between the various authors called by the same
personal name. The hymn “Judge of all the Earth” (_Shofet Kol ha-Arez_)
was certainly by a Solomon; Zunz identifies him with the Frenchman
Solomon, son of Abun. This Solomon is described as “the youth”
(_ha-Na’ar_), perhaps in the sense that there was a “senior” poet of
the same name. According to Zunz, again, Solomon bar Abun’s period
of active authorship lay presumably between the years 1170 and 1190.
(_Literaturgeschichte der synagogalen Poesie_, p. 311.)
Of all his works the piyyut we are considering is by far the most
popular. A spirited rendering of the poem, by Mrs. R. N. Salaman,
may be found in the Routledge Mahzor so ably edited in part by her
father. (See the _Day of Atonement_, morning service, page 86.) Three
stanzas had, however, long before been published by Mrs. Henry Lucas in
her _Jewish Year_ (p. 44). Some years ago the same gifted translator
completed the whole of the hymn, and her version is now printed here
in full. I say “in full,” though there is a longer form of the poem
containing _six_ verses. Zunz, however, only assigns _five_ verses to
the original, and the sixth verse is probably an unauthorized addition.
It repeats the idea of the second verse, and also disturbs the acrostic
signature. This piyyut or hymn must have been designed for the New
Year. True, in the only “German” Mahzor known to many, the poem is
included among the Selihot for the Day of Atonement. Though, however,
Solomon bar Abun’s masterpiece is fairly suitable for the Fast, it
is not altogether appropriate for that occasion. The “German” rite,
accordingly, is well advised when it also employs the piyyut for the
day before New Year. Even more to be commended are those liturgies--the
Yemenite and some of the “Spanish”--which appoint the poem for the
New Year itself. That is obviously its true place. With its opening
phrase, “Judge of all the earth,” the hymn declares its character. It
was written for the Day of Judgment--that is, for the New Year’s Day.
Moreover, these initial words are taken from Abraham’s intercession
for the sinners of Sodom (Genesis 18. 25), and this is preceded by
the announcement of Isaac’s birth, an incident which one form of the
Jewish tradition connects with the New Year. It must be remembered in
general that prayers intended originally for one occasion were often
transferred to others. Thus the _‘Alenu_ prayer, now used every day,
was at first composed for the New Year _Musaf_.
Let us now turn to the poem itself, which, as already stated, is
reproduced in the version from the hand of Mrs. Lucas.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account