Hebrew literature -- History and criticism; Jewish literature -- History and criticism; Jews in literature
effect is not devoid of realistic power. That this is probably the true
explanation of the Sinai scene is suggested by another--Jacob’s dream.
Here we see Jacob asleep (with one angel descending, another higher
up ascending the ladder--the artist has not troubled himself with the
problem as to how the angels contrived to cross one another). But we
also see Jacob awake, _on the same picture_, for he is anointing the
Beth-el stone and converting it into an altar.
Certainly the drawings, sadly though they lack proportion, are
realistic. Especially is this true of the portrayal of Lot’s wife
transformed into a pillar of salt. Disproportionate in size, for she is
taller than Sodom’s loftiest pinnacles, yet the artist has succeeded in
suggesting the gradual stiffening of her figure: we _see_ her becoming
rigid before our eyes. There is clearly much that modern artists might
learn from these medieval gropings towards realism. Some artists
have already learned much. It is quite obvious, for instance, that
Burne-Jones must have steeped himself in the suggestive mysticism of
the Middle Ages before he painted his marvellous Creation series. The
parallel between his series and the series in the Sarajevo Haggadah is
undeniable. Though he never saw this Haggadah, he was well acquainted
with similar work in the Missals. Just as Keats evolved his theory
as to the identity of truth and beauty from a Greek vase, so the
pre-Raphaelites retold on vases what they read in their moments of
communion with the medieval spirit.
And this leads to what must be my last word now on this Hebrew
masterpiece. If a Burne-Jones can thus imitate, why not a Solomon
or a Lilien? The latter has now produced a series of illustrations
to the Bible, but we want something less coldly classic, something
more warmly symbolic. It was indicated above, with regret, that Mr.
Haes’ photographs of the Crawford Haggadah are still unpublished. But
over and above reproductions of extant works, we need new works. Now
the Jewish artist who illustrates a Bible ought not to be content to
illustrate anything but a Hebrew text. And if a Bible be for several
reasons out of the question, why should we not have a new Haggadah,
written by a living Jewish artist, who shall, from a close study
of olden models, do for us what Burne-Jones did?--that is, extract
from the mysticism of a by-gone age those abiding truths which our
contemporary age demands of its art.
A PIYYUT BY BAR ABUN
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account