Callinicus : $b A defence of chemical warfareHaldane, J. B. S. (John Burdon Sanderson)
Philosophy
Callinicus : $b A defence of chemical warfare
Haldane, J. B. S. (John Burdon Sanderson)
Chemical warfare; Gases, Asphyxiating and poisonous -- War use
This kind of tactics was impossible during the Great War for a very
simple reason. There was not enough mustard gas. The Germans used a
quite surprisingly complicated process for its manufacture. When we
decided to follow their example, one of our chemists (a Cambridge
man, I am glad to say) hit on a vastly cheaper and speedier method of
manufacture. Unfortunately, our first supplies only arrived in the
field in September, 1918. There is reason to think that the knowledge
that we were at last about to develop gas and smoke warfare on a large
scale had a good deal to do with the acceptance by the Germans of the
armistice conditions.
The reason why we did not use mustard gas earlier is also simple and
rather instructive.
In 1915 a British chemist proposed to a General who was concerned with
such questions that the British should use dichlorethyl sulphide.
“Does it kill?” asked the General. “No,” he was told, “but it will
disable enormous numbers of the enemy temporarily.” “That is no good
to us,” said the man of blood; “we want something that will kill.” It
is interesting to find how completely the ideas of this worthy soldier
as to the object of war coincided with those of the average intelligent
child of five years old. I may remind you that Clausewitz held the view
that the object of war was to impose one’s will upon the enemy. This
idea would, however, appear to have been too abstract, too complicated,
or too humanitarian for the British military mind. At any rate, it
had its fill of killing. It was not, therefore, until the Germans had
demonstrated upon the persons of some tens of thousands of British
soldiers (we had 14,000 casualties, though with only 400 deaths,
during the first three weeks of the mustard gas war) that there was
something to be said for a weapon that was not primarily designed to
kill, that we began to use it.
It seems, then, that mustard gas would enable an army to gain ground
with far less killed on either side than the methods used in the late
war, and would tend to establish a war of movement leading to a fairly
rapid decision, as in the campaigns of the past. It would not much
upset the present balance of power, Germany’s chemical industry being
counterpoised by French negro troops. Indians may be expected to be
nearly as immune as negroes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account